> On Apr 30, 2017, at 12:13 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
> Shims are fine for hacks, but few are that.
>
> qmail has an "installer", but the source needs hacked to properly
> [confine] install and run anywhere other than djb's pet /var/qmail .
I was going to recommend netqmail,
Shims are fine for hacks, but few are that.
qmail has an "installer", but the source needs hacked to properly
[confine] install and run anywhere other than djb's pet /var/qmail .
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> PINE users from 40 years ago can't seem to give it up, so that works
> for some folks - alpine these days I think.
Thanks. I'll take a look.
> But if you want some really small and light, and still pty based,
> Emacs
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 02:40:01AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> qmail had a shitty license, but it was the shit till world
> moved on and it went unmaintained. And still probably
> nobody offers even the obvious basic TLS IPv6
Unix pipeline? What's wrong with socat / ssh?
netcat allowed me to rescue
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Ben Tasker wrote:
> Incidentally, mailpile also satisfies
Wow! Thanks for mentioning Mailpile. It looks promising. Completely
open source with built-in PGP support! I'll give it a try.
But now I'm wondering what other FLOSS mail clients
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 11:11 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up
> the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform
> yourself to the awesome.
Good old days!
> If you're getting too much mail, turn it
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Greg Newby wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
Thank you for the reply Greg!
> A quick FYI, since I am the current list maintainer:
>
> 1. This field is present in postings, and could be used to filter, or to
> munge or otherwise direct or update the
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> Also, Thunderbird + Enigmail = complete and user friendly GPG support
> for webmail accounts, with no time consuming failure prone
> work-arounds required.
Yes. I have been wanting to use GPG keys in Tunderbird using
[2017-04-29 17:37] Zenaan Harkness
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> > neomutt
>
> In Debian and derivatives, I think this is called notmuch-mutt
>
> > maildrop,
>
> or mailagent (or fdm, which also fetches mail, can't speak to it
> though..)
>
>
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:41 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> Users can also fuck around with Thunderbird or Mailpile.
>
Incidentally, mailpile also satisfies the desired requirement not to have
to click into a seperate folder. It uses GMail like labels
Has plenty of other drawbacks,
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up
> the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform
> yourself to the awesome. If you're getting too much mail, turn it into not
> much mail with
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:37:38PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> > No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up
> > the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform
> > yourself to the awesome.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:37:38PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> > No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up
> > the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform
> > yourself to the awesome.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up
> the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform
> yourself to the awesome. If you're getting too much mail, turn it into not
> much mail with
No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up
the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform
yourself to the awesome. If you're getting too much mail, turn it into not
much mail with neomutt, maildrop, msmtp, fetchmail, etc. Users can
also fuck around
The Thunderbird filter I use looks like:
On 04/28/2017 01:29 PM, John Newman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:15:52AM +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I am subscribed to handful of mailing lists and I'm sure many of you
>> are too. It gets pretty overwhelming when I check my
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:27:04 -0400
Steve Kinney wrote:
>
> Bit of fun: GMail's AJAX code repeatedly harvests draft message text
> in progress while-u-type,
aka almost-realtime-keylogging
a feature that makes recovery from a browser
> crash without lost work
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:15:52AM +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am subscribed to handful of mailing lists and I'm sure many of you
> are too. It gets pretty overwhelming when I check my mailbox at the
> end of day or after couple of days.
>
> I would like to request the
Dear colleagues,
A quick FYI, since I am the current list maintainer:
1. This field is present in postings, and could be used to filter, or to munge
or otherwise direct or update the messages you receive:
List-Id: The Cypherpunks Mailing List
2. We did not use the Mailman setting to prepend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2017 05:07 AM, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Vasily Kolobkov
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Avinash! No offence, but
>
> Hello Vasily! Thanks for the reply. BTW I don't see a single
> reason
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Vasily Kolobkov
wrote:
> Hey Avinash! No offence, but
Hello Vasily! Thanks for the reply. BTW I don't see a single reason
why would someone get offended. :)
> why don't you tweak your/choose another mail client that can sort
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> Why not filter each mailing list to different mailbox?
Hey Georgi, I know that we can set filters but thanks for the tip anyways. :)
It's just that prefixing a list name seems to be a standard practice.
Many lists
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:15:52AM +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> I am subscribed to handful of mailing lists and I'm sure many of you
> are too. It gets pretty overwhelming when I check my mailbox at the
> end of day or after couple of days.
>
Why not filter each mailing list to different
Hello!
I am subscribed to handful of mailing lists and I'm sure many of you
are too. It gets pretty overwhelming when I check my mailbox at the
end of day or after couple of days.
I would like to request the admins/owners to add [Cypherpunks] at the
beginning of a subject by default to easily
24 matches
Mail list logo