I believe "call for harm" might be seen as a way to trully enforce personal
responsibility of politicians. If the bet was simply about being or not being
in office, it wouldn't really mean much.
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox:
https://tutanota.com
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 14:48:34 -0700
Steven Schear wrote:
> I can't understand why anyone, who really wanted to use PMs to remove from
> power a person they object to, would call for harm (and create a lightening
> rod for regulation and law enforcement) when then they could just as easily
> wager
On 08/03/2018 02:48 PM, Steven Schear wrote:
> I can't understand why anyone, who really wanted to use PMs to remove from
> power a person they object to, would call for harm (and create a lightening
> rod for regulation and law enforcement) when then they could just as easily
> wager on whether
I can't understand why anyone, who really wanted to use PMs to remove from
power a person they object to, would call for harm (and create a lightening
rod for regulation and law enforcement) when then they could just as easily
wager on whether that person would, for example, still hold that
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:43:18 -0700
Steven Schear wrote:
> If AP markets persist, become effective and go "mainstream" they should be
> considered a RLT (Radical Leveling Technology).
What remains to be seen is an ordinary gambling system turning into a
true 'prediction' market.
If AP markets persist, become effective and go "mainstream" they should be
considered a RLT (Radical Leveling Technology).
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 11:09 AM Steven Schear wrote:
> "These assassination markets raise ethical questions for Augur's creators
> and force us to confront a hideous side of
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 11:09:27 -0700
Steven Schear wrote:
> "These assassination markets raise ethical questions for Augur's creators
> and force us to confront a hideous side of society that seems to lurk in
> the seemingly pseudonymous depths of the internet."
>
> Should the functioning
On 08/03/2018 11:02 AM, jim bell wrote:
> Personally, it would be easy to be outraged and appalled by Krug's response.
> He seems to unintentionally demonstrate the apparent invincibility and
> irresponsibility of youth. ...
Damn, what an idiot.
"These assassination markets raise ethical questions for Augur's creators
and force us to confront a hideous side of society that seems to lurk in
the seemingly pseudonymous depths of the internet."
Should the functioning existence of these markets raise different ethical
questions from when
https://www.ethnews.com/augurs-joey-krug-comments-on-assassination-markets
By
MATTHEW DE SILVA
WRITER
ETHNEWS.COM
Shortly after Augur’s launch, some users created cryptocurrency-settled
assassination markets. Since the Augur protocol exists on the Ethereum
blockchain, the marketplace exists
10 matches
Mail list logo
