Oddly, I just looked at my browser's (Yahoo) spam folder, and I noticed that
all the messages from grarpam were there. I did not do that, and certainly not
intentionally. At least as far back as Nov 13. Presumably all messages before
that got auto-deleted from the spam folder.
Anyway,
> Besides, you already have general prediction markets already
> What are your thoughts on that?
There are a great many games out there,
more and more everyday (as open tech rightly hath no pause itself),
many of which many fail to understand.
Play on, merrily, my friends and fiends.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:58:38 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote, replying to gmkarl
> And what speech occurs can
> probably be made anonymous. How would "the rich" target their "enemies" if
> they cannot identify them?
>
Jim, you are taking anonimity for granted it seems, but in reality the
You fail to understand that society is not comprised
only by rational actors and is more complex than a simple
if-else statement. Adding one more thing to spread fear
and death is redundant. On a massive scale this ends up
being at best a PR disaster for the people backing it up.
Besides, you
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 17, 2018 8:58 PM, jim bell wrote:
> Furrier:
>
> You show your biases when you say "creating a tool to murder people".
> Arguably, the AP as a new tool (as I foresee it) would also allow people to
> defend themselves from aggression, and I
> creating a tool to murder people
No.
AP is really only invoked as legitimate defensive action
to aggression, as would any other existing and well
calibrated natural response to same.
Most fail to recognize the important early mechanism of AP...
that *well* before such defensive measures need
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:16:51 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
> On Friday, December 14, 2018, 2:20:10 PM PST, juan
> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:24:10 -0500
> John Newman wrote:
>
>
> >> I'm cynical - about AP, about humanity, about the chances of ever
> >> divesting ourself of
Furrier:
You show your biases when you say "creating a tool to murder people".
Arguably, the AP as a new tool (as I foresee it) would also allow people to
defend themselves from aggression, and I define "aggression" to include being
victimized by governments. Most weapons can be misused. A
On Friday, December 14, 2018, 2:20:10 PM PST, juan wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:24:10 -0500
John Newman wrote:
>> I'm cynical - about AP, about humanity, about the chances of ever
>> divesting ourself of what seems to be the plotted destination for
>> civilization: dystopia for the
Your idea sucks because creating a tool to murder people is not adding anything
new to the picture. We already have it and it's called "the goverment". Like
any other violence-provocative tool that fits the status quo, the more powerful
people are going to take control of it and use it for
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:24:10 -0500
John Newman wrote:
>
> I'm cynical - about AP, about humanity, about the chances of ever
> divesting ourself of what seems to be the plotted destination for
> civilization: dystopia for the masses.
Don't worry! There will be no dystopia for the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:31:38PM +, Karl wrote:
> Came up with a counterargument:
>
> The rich few already control the many perhaps via lobbying, bribing,
> black markets, but AP makes the process transparent, resulting in an
> environment that is actually safer than before.
I think it
Any answer from Karl or Furrier?
Naturally, I'm genuinely interested to find out if my AP idea has any flaws.
Many people could say, and no doubt many of them have said, 'I just don't LIKE
your AP idea, Jim!'. But that doesn't mean it wouldn't work. Or that it
isn't necessary.
A person
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018, 2:18:45 PM PST, Karl wrote:
>I think I'm beginning to understand some of where you come from. It
sounds like you blame our problems on the presence of legal
government.
I don't know why you added the word "legal" before the word "government". A
redundancy?
Jim,
Thanks for your reply.
I think I'm beginning to understand some of where you come from. It
sounds like you blame our problems on the presence of legal
government. I believe government is mostly just expressing the wishes
of those with the power to influence votes and laws.
I see money as
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:31:38 +
Karl wrote:
> Came up with a counterargument:
>
> The rich few already control the many perhaps via lobbying, bribing,
> black markets,
the rich and the government akready have vast powers. The thieving
oligarchy also know as 'the rich' don't really
My comments inline.
Jim Bell
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018, 3:29:14 AM PST, Karl
wrote:
>Hi Jim Bell,>I sent you a message some time ago when I heard about this idea,
>but I
didn't get a reply.
I searched, and found a number of messages about "Public Shielded Work
Came up with a counterargument:
The rich few already control the many perhaps via lobbying, bribing,
black markets, but AP makes the process transparent, resulting in an
environment that is actually safer than before.
Karl
On 12/11/18, Karl wrote:
> Hi Jim Bell,
>
> I sent you a message some
Hi Jim Bell,
I sent you a message some time ago when I heard about this idea, but I
didn't get a reply.
If you receive this e-mail, this is my misunderstanding:
As it offers a market, doesn't AP give life-and-death power to those
with the most money?
Wouldn't this provide for the set of people
furrier
Furrier:
I notice that you haven't responded to my comment. Do you not have any answer?
You claim to not "agree" with me. If that were the case, you should be able
to explain why.
Why don't you think AP could work? What do you believe wouldn't work about it?
On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 23:23:05 +
furrier wrote:
> I watched you live both in Acapulco and Prague. I don't agree with you
> and I don't understand how can people be so naive to think that AP
> can actually work. I am against the whole idea, it's the same thing as
> cracking down on
[apparently the address for the CP list wasn't the one I normally use]
My comments inline:
On Sunday, December 9, 2018, 3:23:09 PM PST, furrier
wrote:
>I watched you live both in Acapulco and Prague. I don't agree with you
and I don't understand how can people be so naive to think
I watched you live both in Acapulco and Prague. I don't agree with you
and I don't understand how can people be so naive to think that AP
can actually work. I am against the whole idea, it's the same thing as
cracking down on cryptocurrency or dark markets to fight terrorism.
If you want to fight
On Saturday, December 8, 2018, 7:37:50 AM PST, John Newman
wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:37 PM, furrier wrote:
>
>> I will disagree with you here. Craig may be an idiot and
>> the fact that he holds patents makes him dangerous but he
>> does not have the network effect that the BCH
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:37 PM, furrier wrote:
>
> I will disagree with you here. Craig may be an idiot and
> the fact that he holds patents makes him dangerous but he
> does not have the network effect that the BCH "community" has.
> They are all over the place when it comes to fake
>
I will disagree with you here. Craig may be an idiot and
the fact that he holds patents makes him dangerous but he
does not have the network effect that the BCH "community" has.
They are all over the place when it comes to fake
libertarianism. I attended Anarchapulco last February, these
guys are
On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 23:25:52 +
furrier wrote:
> FYI I don't give a flying fuck about BSV and I consider
> Faketoshi an idiot and dangerous scammer but I really
> enjoyed this guy's breakdown of the BCH problems that
> were made apparent after the split. Instead of making
> assumptions, you
FYI I don't give a flying fuck about BSV and I consider
Faketoshi an idiot and dangerous scammer but I really
enjoyed this guy's breakdown of the BCH problems that
were made apparent after the split. Instead of making
assumptions, you could just ask.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday,
On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 20:05:44 +
furrier wrote:
> https://medium.com/@_unwriter/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-cash-experiment-52b86d8cd187
>
> Libertardians enjoying their scammy experiment
LMAO! The guy who wrote that article is an 'ex' bcrash supporter who is
crying because
https://medium.com/@_unwriter/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-cash-experiment-52b86d8cd187
Libertardians enjoying their scammy experiment
30 matches
Mail list logo
