On 01/31/2019 04:04 PM, Punk wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 20:51:44 -0700
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>
>> However, all of these distributed storage systems are similarly
>> vulnerable, more or less. You are potentially screwed if an adversary
>> can 1) peer directly with you, and get your IP address; and
On 01/30/2019 09:55 AM, Punk wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:39:07 -0500
> grarpamp wrote:
>
>
>> https://i.redd.it/li4f40slbcd21.jpg
>
>
> so freenet is not listed there, and instead there are a bunch of
> shitcoins/scams like maidsafe - which has been in 'development' since forever.
On 1/30/19, jim bell wrote:
> Okay, sounds like the same idea, more or less. But I have an excuse for
> being 15 years too late: I was, uh, occupied at the time.
A similar xor scheme here...
http://monolith.sourceforge.net/
Shame they probably do not let people read, even by teletype.
People
Okay, sounds like the same idea, more or less. But I have an excuse for being
15 years too late: I was, uh, occupied at the time.
Jim Bell
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019, 9:11:31 AM PST, grarpamp
wrote:
On 1/29/19, jim bell wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_Ve
On 1/29/19, jim bell wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_VernamWhat if a challengable
> document, call it "A", is essentially split up into two: Take random (or
> pseudorandom) string, the length of document "A", call it "B", is XOR'd
> (exclusive-or'd) with "A", and the result w
Interesting, useful development. Looking at the table, in the second item
below, I see that most of these storage systems use "client side" encryption.
I assume that means that the person who enters the data is in charge of the
encryption. But I can see the possibility that this information
https://reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/akyslc/decentralised_storage_comparison/
https://i.redd.it/li4f40slbcd21.jpg
