Re: Let's play Whack-A-Troll

2016-12-13 Thread juan
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:50:54 + me...@riseup.net wrote: > On 2016-12-12 18:00, Razer wrote: > > > I believe it's intentional and targeted because it seemed > > to begin in earnest after most people on the list essentially > > supported @ioerror when he was institutionally slandered by a few >

Re: Let's play Whack-A-Troll

2016-12-13 Thread me03w
On 2016-12-12 18:00, Razer wrote: On 12/12/2016 09:18 AM, me...@riseup.net wrote: What works like a charm on radio (CB/Ham) works on the internet. Not replying to inflammatory posts period no matter the email address is more functional than simply ignoring email addresses and nicks, which are sub

Re: Let's play Whack-A-Troll

2016-12-13 Thread rooty
Catskillmarina = me03w - you've been warned - Original Message On Dec 12, 2016, 9:18 AM, wrote: This group is supposedly Anarchist-leaning. Is there a better place to see how a group can police itself than this historical mailing list? Please forgive the use of the word "po

Re: Let's play Whack-A-Troll

2016-12-12 Thread juan
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:18:34 + me...@riseup.net wrote: > And of course, there are the other trolls already on the > list. You mean, people who consider commie statist murderer fidel castro a heroe? By the way, your message doesn't make sense. First you say do

Re: Let's play Whack-A-Troll

2016-12-12 Thread Razer
On 12/12/2016 09:18 AM, me...@riseup.net wrote: > This group is supposedly Anarchist-leaning. Is there a better place to > see how a group can police itself than this historical mailing list? > Please forgive the use of the word "police" :). > > It seems obvious to me, and confirmed by other discu