On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 08:12:56PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> On 2020-10-15 16:16, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> > All these solutions are built around git.
> >
> > Git is fully decentralized.
> >
> > So just share a git repository using git-daemon, gitosis, or a guest
> > account with
On 2020-10-15 16:16, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> All these solutions are built around git.
>
> Git is fully decentralized.
>
> So just share a git repository using git-daemon, gitosis, or a guest
> account with git-shell instead of the normal shell, and call it a day.
I neglected to list the
On 2020-10-15 17:36, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> and by the way, what am I shilling, exactly?
I would guess you are an NSA shill who is here to disrupt the
development of non NSA approved cryptography by sowing distrust of
anything or anyone that gives the NSA a hard time and sowing
All these solutions are built around git.
Git is fully decentralized.
So just share a git repository using git-daemon, gitosis, or a guest
account with git-shell instead of the normal shell, and call it a day.
On 2020-10-15 07:30, Karl wrote:
> https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/question-on-issue-and-wiki-access/4293/4
>
> gmkarl
>
> > I’m thinking of how relevant phabricator is for decentralized
> > community work, where the person running the server may not keep
> > running it forever, and
james,
On 10/14/20, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> On 2020-10-14 20:32, Karl wrote:
>> james, We need actual solutions, not solutions that say they are good
>> in a really convincing way.
>
...
> GitLab, and Phabricator.
I went a little crazy there, but phabricator seems ok I suppose. It's
On 2020-10-14 20:32, Karl wrote:
> james, We need actual solutions, not solutions that say they are good
> in a really convincing way.
Blender is a huge open source success, breaking into the big time, being
free and open tool for threedee drawing. It’s development platform is of
course self
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:58 AM wrote:
>> Use Phabricator, preferably self hosted.
>>
>> It is genuinely open source.
On 2020-10-14 20:11, Karl wrote:
> so you know, phabricator rejects pull requests
No it does not. It rejects pull requests submitted through GitHub - as
it should.
Pull
james, We need actual solutions, not solutions that say they are good
in a really convincing way.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:58 AM wrote:
>
> On 10/14/20, Karl wrote:
> > Bad alternative: gitlab.com service
> > The Gitlab.com SaaS is often considered an alternative to MS Github,
> > but it's
I could barely control this reply, because I saw this:
```
Write Things Down
You can write things down and revert them later with Phriction, which
is a document wiki.
You can write text.
That text stays there.
You can read it later.
You can make text purple. Purple text resolves conflicts!
```
I appreciate phabricator's dedication to conflict resolution and would
like to try it out.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:11 AM Karl wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:58 AM wrote:
> >
> > On 10/14/20, Karl wrote:
> > > Bad alternative: gitlab.com service
> > > The Gitlab.com SaaS is often
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:58 AM wrote:
>
> On 10/14/20, Karl wrote:
> > Bad alternative: gitlab.com service
> > The Gitlab.com SaaS is often considered an alternative to MS Github,
> > but it's even worse--
>
> Use Phabricator, preferably self hosted.
>
> It is genuinely open source.
so you
On 10/14/20, Karl wrote:
> Bad alternative: gitlab.com service
> The Gitlab.com SaaS is often considered an alternative to MS Github,
> but it's even worse--
Use Phabricator, preferably self hosted.
It is genuinely open source.
On 10/14/20, Karl wrote:
> yerbamate.dev
> git.openprivacy.ca
> git.nixnet.xyz
> git.sr.ht
> framagit.org: Gitlab CE instance
> git.jami.net: Gitlab CE instance, perhaps dedicated to jami
> sourcehut.org
http://dweb.happybeing.com/blog/post/002-safegit-decentralised-git-on-safe-network/
I'd
On 10/14/20, Karl wrote:
> Bad alternative: gitlab.com service
> The Gitlab.com SaaS is often considered an alternative to MS Github,
> but it's even worse--
>
> for many reasons
* Sexist treatment toward saleswomen who are [told to
15 matches
Mail list logo
