Taser is a loser
Taser is a loser
Taser is a loser
Original Message
On Dec 9, 2019, 9:39 AM, Razer wrote:
> On 12/8/19 8:50 PM, jim bell requested list members to spam and stalk people
> who bailed from this list over two decades ago because scumbags like him
> made this
On 12/8/19 8:50 PM, jim bell requested list members to spam and stalk
people who bailed from this list over two decades ago because scumbags
like him made this cyber-anarchist list useless as anything but a spam
collector.
I still want people to try to inform prior subscribers to the CP
On Monday, November 25, 2019, 11:15:34 AM PST, coderman
wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, November 25, 2019 6:52 PM, jim bell wrote:
...
>the denial using Glomar exception is here:
https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2019/02/11/1-29-19_MR67282_REJ-G_106095.pdf
On Monday, November 25, 2019, 10:52:43 AM PST, jim bell
wrote:
My comments inline: Jim Bell
On Monday, November 25, 2019, 08:48:49 AM PST, coderman
wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, November 25, 2019 6:34 AM, jim bell wrote:
...
Can I see the
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, November 25, 2019 6:52 PM, jim bell wrote:
...
>>the denial using Glomar exception is here:
>
> https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2019/02/11/1-29-19_MR67282_REJ-G_106095.pdf
>
> This document doesn't say why the Glomar exception is applicable. It
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 24, 2019 10:04 PM, jim bell wrote:
...
> Notice that the exception called "Glomar" refers to the non-release of
> information that would tend to show that a specific person or persons were
> under some sort of criminal investigation.
> From:
Everybody note that I haven't gotten an answer to this from Ryan Lackey, nor
has Declan McCullagh responded to many emails sent his way. Tom Busby seems
unusually quiet, as well: Busby, the keeper of the Archive, should be
enthusiastically working to figure out what happened that would
Yes, it looks like this:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6553646-Socialmediamonitoring.html#document/p1
will be an excellent case to limit the government's ability to assert
various forms of secrecy.
The FOIA could be filed in the Northern District of California, in order to
Did you see this recent upload from me:
jim bell To:CypherPunks
Nov 22 at 11:54 PM
Judge Says The FBI Can't Keep Refusing To Confirm Or Deny The Existence Of
Social Media Monitoring Documents
How will this affect FOIA applications on Cypherpunks
data?
That is a case
Among the exceptions likely to be cited would be privacy, national
security, ongoing litigation, etc.
On 2019-11-24 03:06, Douglas Lucas wrote:
> Via MuckRock I've filed nearly 100 requests:
> https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/profile/douglaslucas/
>
> Several of my requests have returned
Via MuckRock I've filed nearly 100 requests:
https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/profile/douglaslucas/
Several of my requests have returned documents, and a few have formed
the basis of articles by me, e.g this one regarding our gentlehearted
friends at Stratfor --
note that prior requests for cypherpunks (not those years) returned
unsuccessful results from DoJ and NSA:
DoJ -> No Responsive Documents
https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/cypherpunks-67284/
NSA -> Glomar
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 22, 2019 9:35 PM, jim bell wrote:
> To Ryan Carboni,
> It looks like you are familiar with the practice of writing and filing
> Freedom of Information Act requests.
> https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/profile/ryaz/
>
> Given that these
What to do?
First, confirm with "enough" 1995-96 users of the CP list in that there is,
indeed, an egregious lack of emails that have a few strings: "jim bell",
"jimb...@pacifier.com", " ap ", and "assassination politics". They will
remember what the 1995 archive should have contained.
I'm going to put this response onto the Cypherpunks list, so that everybody
learns what is going on.
You said, "I don’t think they were intentionally edited by anyone." That may
very well be because you haven't checked. Would you know what to look for, if
I hadn't told you? Probably
Ok what can be done about this?
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 15:35, jim bell wrote:
> To Ryan Carboni,
> It looks like you are familiar with the practice of writing and filing
> Freedom of Information Act requests.
> https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/profile/ryaz/
>
> Given that these requests can
To Ryan Carboni,It looks like you are familiar with the practice of writing
and filing Freedom of Information Act requests.
https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/profile/ryaz/
Given that these requests can take a long time, I think it would be appropriate
to make such a filing for any
https://rocketreach.co/ryan-lackey-email_255468
- @mit.edu
- @venona.com
- @cloudflare.com
- @hotmail.com
- @cryptoseal.com
- @gmail.com
I am including Ryan Lackey in this thread, since he seems to have been involved
in the Cypherpunks archive during the relevant time
Still no response. And, I don't see any enthusiastic efforts from others
currently on CP to contact any other journalists or previous CP people to help
uncover this mystery. Will this become embarrassing? Yes.
Jim Bell
On Monday, November 18, 2019, 10:42:26 AM PST,
Well, I sent out an email to Declan McCullagh, dec...@well.com, and so far
no reply. At least openly, there would not appear to be any reason he should
resist the idea of returning and helping us figure out what happened with the
faked 1995 archive. He apparently continues to write news
The 1996 Cypherpunks Archive, at least the raw Venona files, contain the first
6 Parts of the AP essay. Here is why:
>From cypherpunks@MHonArc.venona Wed Dec 17 23:17:14 2003
From: jim bell
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:44:56 +0800
To: cypherpu...@toad.com
Subject: Ooops! Sincerest apologies.
Tom Busby, Archivist for the Cypherpunks Archive:
Please tell us what you have been doing about this forgery, and what do you
intend to do in the future. See the material below. I suggest contacting the
people who claim to have been involved with generation and the maintenance of
the
22 matches
Mail list logo
