Re: [WAR] ...

On 9/1/16 1:35 PM, juan wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:21:19 -0700 > "Stephen D. Williams" wrote: > >> On 9/1/16 1:16 PM, juan wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:34:53 -0700 >>> "Stephen D. Williams" wrote: >>> Our political system limits and weeds out crazy,

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

Greg Newby wrote: > As I just wrote, this message should be going out via the > *new* server and settings. It's addressed to cypherpunks at > lists.cpunks.org, as opposed to the regular address, cypherpunks > at cpunks.org Folks, If all has gone well, this message will reach you via the new

Re: moving on (multiple future forks)

"Stephen D. Williams" wrote: > Cool. On the previous question of replicated email and mailman > servers, I was recently looking into ways to do that. Since all > email messages have unique IDs already, it isn't difficult to > replicate messages at any point while avoiding

Re: [WAR] ...

On 9/1/16 2:28 PM, juan wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:59:16 -0700 > "Stephen D. Williams" wrote: > >> On 9/1/16 1:35 PM, juan wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:21:19 -0700 >>> "Stephen D. Williams" wrote: >>> On 9/1/16 1:16 PM, juan wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep

Fwd: Feminist Principles of the Internet

> Cecilia Tanaka: > www.feministinternet.net Fuck your feminist (otherist) principals.

Google App Store Takedown Process

Google App Store Takedown Process? First, does anyone have an example of App store export restriction takedown process, especially for including encryption libraries? Second, where are any lists of all encryption and encoding functions, especially all the various NIST and russian submissions and

Re: distractions

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:11:50PM -0600, Mirimir wrote: > Right, mostly by your bullshit. And Juan's scatological blather. So flowery words are the part you find relevant. Got it.

Re: [WAR] ...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/01/2016 02:01 AM, Mirimir wrote: >> Technologists are likely to assume that political problems are >> products of stupidity, and that putting their own kind of >> intelligence in the driver's seat would automatically create >> optimum

Re: [WAR] ...

On 09/01/2016 02:17 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:01:41AM -0600, Mirimir wrote: >> On 08/31/2016 11:43 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: >>> On 08/31/2016 11:47 PM, Александр wrote: > > Mirimir, fantastic post. And a choice quote to succinctly summarise from > the Brzezinski essay

Fwd: Feminist Principles of the Internet

Juan, my love, dear 'mal cogido' of my life, Did I mention today how much I adore you? *-* With all my love and tenderness, ow! <3 Ceci -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Forwarded message -- From: "nettime's token

Re: [WAR] ...

On 08/31/2016 11:43 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 08/31/2016 11:47 PM, Александр wrote: >> this has already been discussed dozens of times (on the thread >> about "offtopic" posts) -> Zen is NOT talking to himself. There are >> thousands of people here on the list. Only~15 of them participate >>

Re: [WAR] If Hillary Becomes USA President, Will We Have a Nuclear War?

In 1964, the Democrats ran a famous commercial, a little girl counting flower petals, turning into an image of the explosion of an atomic bomb.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDTBnsqxZ3k Trying to suggest that Barry Goldwater would get us into war. I think that a major element of the hypocrisy

Re: distractions

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:11:50PM -0600, Mirimir wrote: > On 08/31/2016 09:59 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Whilst those with any passion for actual political anarchy (aka direct > > democracy) are drowned out with rather pathetic psyop attempts at > > steering the conversation, > > > > the

Re: Scatological distractions [Was: distractions]

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:29:15 -0700 Razer wrote: > > > On 08/31/2016 09:40 PM, juan wrote (in more ways than simply > typographically): > > > > piece-of-shit > > > Look up the definition of "scatological" Juan... I know you can do I know you are stupid

Re: [WAR] ...

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:21:19PM -0700, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > On 9/1/16 1:16 PM, juan wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:34:53 -0700 > > "Stephen D. Williams" wrote: > > > >> Our > >> political system limits and weeds out crazy, preventing it from > >> taking over. > >

Re: IndependentOnion / RotorBrowser / Rotor - Interview

Is this typical? It doesn't SEEM 'transparent' "This organization has no public members. You must be a member to see who’s a part of this organization." https://github.com/IndependentOnion Reminds me of hate groups that infest Facebook's 'closed groups'. Rr On 09/01/2016 06:40 PM, grarpamp

Re: [WAR] ...

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:17:12PM +0900, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote: > We do make sport of improvement plans for the global situation. I feel we > do pretty well, probably on account of tossing history and a lot of feeling > out of the window. More importantly, we ignore the difficulty of

Dark Patterns

http://darkpatterns.org/ A Dark Pattern is a user interface that has been carefully crafted to trick users into doing things, such as buying insurance with their purchase or signing up for recurring bills. Normally when you think of “bad design”, you think of the creator as being sloppy or lazy

Re: [ultra ULTRA private] [for your eyes only] capitalism, socialism, anarchism, self-regulation

On 09/01/2016 08:34 PM, Razer wrote: > > > On 09/01/2016 07:27 PM, juan wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:52:55 -0700 >> Razer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 09/01/2016 06:24 PM, juan wanted me to do something for him: >>> > *find out how many US government agents like me know

Re: Fwd: Feminist Principles of the Internet

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:46:41AM -0300, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > Juan, my love, dear 'mal cogido' of my life, > > Did I mention today how much I adore you? *-* > > With all my love and tenderness, ow! <3 > > Ceci You may find this[1] interesting. -S [1]

Re: [WAR] ...

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:17:12 +0900 Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote: > ATM we would win. Perhaps the idiotic US candidates are put forth to > provoke war on our terms. A war we would win - with large casualties. > A war we should fight if we like democracy and individualistic >