Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 09/08/2016 11:42 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > > And why do you think it was unfair? Simply? Because you don't have the vaguest fucking idea where I've been or what I know. Troll. Rr "You are a liar. Which way did you go? By what rivers? By what lakes? Who went with you? Give him to

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

But didnt you just add to that number :D On 9 September 2016 13:03:09 GMT+01:00, d...@geer.org wrote: >I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of >messages. > >Arrivederci

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of messages. Arrivederci

Re: Pork Rind Disco

Err... It was only a joke with food, uff... :-/ I am vegetarian since my 17 years old and was vegan for one year and some months. Gave up of veganism, I admiss, but great part of my recipes are still vegan and my ex gave me the "Veganomicon" book as gift years ago. So, my Cthulhu is vegan,

Re: Philosophokiddies

> Why was vigilantism weeded out in the US? juans mom shoulda weeded that US Citizen ragebaby out to dumpster before become TROLL but her crackho ass was too high to know better

Re: My obsession with pigs [was: Re: Your obsession with Juan]

On 09/08/2016 11:35 PM, Bastiani Fortress wrote: > You are aware that, that a list is not moderated does not mean people > cannot personally block you from their mail preferences, right? > > 5:01 AM, September 9, 2016, Cypher Piggie : > > Fritz Wuehler >

Re: Philosophokiddies

From: Stephen D. Williams On 9/8/16 9:32 AM, jim bell wrote: I didn't comment about it.  The Purge movies always remind me of AP.  Not the same, but related. http://www.thepurgemovie.co.uk/ >My preference is to consider ideas that are likely to improve things.  AP

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

> if you want usable list, consider some self-moderation, like not > ( being juan ) juan be addicted to TROLL and other sick things and cannot selfstop till stopped by others

Re: My obsession with pigs [was: Re: Your obsession with Juan]

ur stupid mofo u block entire anon email svcs then ur the one making them less useful. what u need do is block TROLLS FROM USA like juan all u sea is juan dodging that so u getting good value from the svc dumbass

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:33:14PM -, Cypher Piggie wrote: > no you stopped reading it because cocksuckers trolls like juan and > zenan the baby filling it up wit jizz > and technically mr cia smart guy if u stopped reading it u wouldnt have > seen the msg u replied to so ur still here

Re: Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

> "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right > to > say it." rught u porkeater > First you create rules that don’t > distinguish between child pornography and famous war photographs. u know what rules juan has about this porn > Then > you

Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

> Ignoring trolls is the best policy. sending juan virus for his lil troll dick is best polecy make sure is written by putin to offend his US Status even more

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 9/9/16 7:42 AM, Razer wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 11:42 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: >> And why do you think it was unfair? > > Simply? Because you don't have the vaguest fucking idea where I've been > or what I know. Troll. None of that matters if you can't have a civil and coherent

Re: Philosophokiddies

> people agree that it will produce a VERY peaceful, POLITE society.  I've this true, once juan and his troll computer self are eliminated, here will become very peaceful list almost zenlike except for zen problem which someone else put hit for

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

no you stopped reading it because cocksuckers trolls like juan and zenan the baby filling it up wit jizz and technically mr cia smart guy if u stopped reading it u wouldnt have seen the msg u replied to so ur still here reading it > I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

> You think that qualifies as ridicule? I should introduce you to my > ex-wife. You wouldn't last five minutes. there is asshole abuser named juanTROLL that need have his balls SMASHed put back inside him by femdom, please put EX of yours and him in contact he is juan@gmail.com

Re: Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

About the same subject. Mark Zuckerberg accused of abusing power after Facebook deletes 'napalm girl' post https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/08/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-napalm-girl-photo-vietnam-war sea sea -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your

Let's Talk About Juan... ;-)

> julian droppin bombs > sea piggie oh now you dont like the free speech and want to make bacon FUCKING HYPOCTIRE an TROLL just like USA JUAN. > As was said last year, my personal intent is to respect the intenet of the founders of this forum/list. which youve bloody well DISrespected since

Why Government Always Gets Cybersecurity Wrong

Why Government Always Gets Cybersecurity Wrong https://fee.org/articles/why-government-always-gets-cybersecurity-wrong/ sea sea -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

> On Sep 9, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > >> On 9/2/16 12:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been >>> Don't taint the provenance... just

WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio

https://deepmind.com/blog/wavenet-generative-model-raw-audio/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12455510

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 9/8/16 6:49 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Stephen, a hint: when real men realise they have ridiculed someone > unfairly, for example with shit like this: > >>> Do you suffer from some version of, as my friend used to say, "post >>> 1960's perception disorder"? You think that qualifies as

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

On 9/2/16 12:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >>> will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been >> Don't taint the provenance... just as your archive contains only yours, >> this file should only contain messages from

Re: Your obsession with Juan

You are aware that, that a list is not moderated does not mean people cannot personally block you from their mail preferences, right?5:01 AM, September 9, 2016, Cypher Piggie : Fritz Wuehler Juan. He's an assholeyes he's an asshole. and a troll. and a USA loving US

Re: WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio

On 09/09/2016 01:14 AM, grarpamp wrote: > https://deepmind.com/blog/wavenet-generative-model-raw-audio/ > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12455510 Oh well. As erichocean noted, "I give us 10-15 years before it's not possible to trust anything you see or hear that's recorded." Also anything

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On 9/8/16 7:17 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 09/08/2016 10:03 PM, Mirimir wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 07:39 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > >> On 09/05/2016 12:15 PM, Александр wrote: > > > >> Well that's odd. I wonder what it's about? Splitting the list > >> into what? Two with different themes? One

Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

Interesting point of view... :) sea sea -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Forwarded message -- From: "Felix Stalder" Date: Sep 9, 2016 5:35 AM Subject: living under algorithmic governance To:

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On 09/09/2016 11:02 AM, Cypher Piggie wrote: >> Bro, you keep sayin' that ;) >> Got a BTC address or something? > > rickroll mah shit large nigga 121Aspd9j8a6t5G3mCvPS3e5H1p3w6PKj2 Bro, there's nothing there :( I meant an address with at least 100 EUR in it :) Better yet, a suitable escrow