Re: US FED Rule 41: We're Gonna Hack Everyone, No Warrants Required

On 09/16/2016 02:37 PM, grarpamp wrote: > https://www.wired.com/2016/09/government-will-soon-able-legally-hack-anyone/ > > The Feds Will Soon Be Able to Legally Hack Almost Anyone > Senator Ron Wyden, Matt Blaze and Susan Landau > > That’s why it’s so concerning that the Justice Department is

Re: flexthismotherfucker

On 09/16/2016 06:28 PM, Razer wrote: > > > On 09/16/2016 11:56 AM, grarpamp wrote: > > >> >> For all we know, all these China / Russia attacks are the NSA / CIA or simply >> US political parties and corporates cracking these boxes through nine proxies >> and taking a whack back at their

Re: flexthismotherfucker

On 09/16/2016 11:56 AM, grarpamp wrote: > > For all we know, all these China / Russia attacks are the NSA / CIA or simply > US political parties and corporates cracking these boxes through nine proxies > and taking a whack back at their opponents in the US. This is my take. It makes the

Re: Firefox [Tor] Browser 0day: Anti-Privacy Implantation at Mass Scale

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:56:11PM -0400, John Newman wrote: > At least you can easily build your entire user land and kernel (and > ports) on FreeBSD. It's very straight forward compared to Linux > distros (Gentoo/arch some what excluded I guess). I suppose this > isn't much consolation if

Re: Fucking comedy of old white guy parasites [Bruce Schneier's blog]

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:45:31 +0300 Georgi Guninski wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0300, juan wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:49:39 +0300 > > Georgi Guninski wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:56PM +0300, Cari Machet

Re: Firefox [Tor] Browser 0day: Anti-Privacy Implantation at Mass Scale

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:12:23PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > If a given port doesn't have a package, maybe invest in committing the > build bits to your OS of choice so that it does. Actually, I am talking about stuff out of /usr/ports. What has gotten my system kind of fucked up is changing

Re: Fucking comedy of old white guy parasites [Bruce Schneier's blog]

On Sep 16, 2016 4:52 PM, "James A. Donald" wrote: > > On 9/16/2016 9:45 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > > "guys" is not very politically correct for the gal chix on the list. > There are no women on the internet. Unless they post tit pictures. OK, already did it... ...but not

Re: Fucking comedy of old white guy parasites [Bruce Schneier's blog]

On 9/16/2016 9:45 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > "guys" is not very politically correct for the gal chix on the list. There are no women on the internet. Unless they post tit pictures.

Re: Firefox [Tor] Browser 0day: Anti-Privacy Implantation at Mass Scale

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:56 PM, John Newman wrote: > Generally I trust that svn updates are not pulling down back doored code. > I don't have the time (or the capacity) to read though all of /usr/src Only about that in part, but also just taking random corrupted bits. If

Re: Firefox [Tor] Browser 0day: Anti-Privacy Implantation at Mass Scale

At least you can easily build your entire user land and kernel (and ports) on FreeBSD. It's very straight forward compared to Linux distros (Gentoo/arch some what excluded I guess). I suppose this isn't much consolation if you're worried about the upstream svn repo itself. Generally I

US FED Rule 41: We're Gonna Hack Everyone, No Warrants Required

https://www.wired.com/2016/09/government-will-soon-able-legally-hack-anyone/ The Feds Will Soon Be Able to Legally Hack Almost Anyone Senator Ron Wyden, Matt Blaze and Susan Landau That’s why it’s so concerning that the Justice Department is planning a vast expansion of government hacking. Under

Re: flexthismotherfucker

On 09/16/2016 02:55 AM, Ben Tasker wrote: But then you'll say that it's just americunts pretending to be Chinsese ;) >>> >>> And you can't prove that's not the case? >> >> Nope, I can't. I just do whois on the IPs. Maybe whois is faked. Or >> maybe they're just leased

Re: flexthismotherfucker

On 09/15/2016 11:32 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/16/2016 12:22 AM, juan wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:59:22 -0600 >> Mirimir wrote: >> >> >>> And it also just so happens that schneie (who you said is a 'good guy'?) is parroting war propaganda about china?

Re: Fucking comedy of old white guy parasites [Bruce Schneier's blog]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:45:31PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0300, juan wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:49:39 +0300 > > Georgi Guninski wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:56PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote: > > > >

Re: Fucking comedy of old white guy parasites [Bruce Schneier's blog]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0300, juan wrote: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:49:39 +0300 > Georgi Guninski wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:56PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote: > > > https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/09/someone_is_lear.html > > > > lol,

Re: flexthismotherfucker

On 09/16/2016 03:55 AM, Ben Tasker wrote: But then you'll say that it's just americunts pretending to be Chinsese ;) >>> >>> And you can't prove that's not the case? >> >> Nope, I can't. I just do whois on the IPs. Maybe whois is faked. Or >> maybe they're just leased anonymously.

Re: flexthismotherfucker

>>> But then you'll say that it's just americunts pretending to be >>> Chinsese ;) >> >> And you can't prove that's not the case? > > Nope, I can't. I just do whois on the IPs. Maybe whois is faked. Or > maybe they're just leased anonymously. I've seen more boxes in China that were *very*

Re: flexthismotherfucker

On 09/16/2016 12:22 AM, juan wrote: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:59:22 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > > >> >>> And it also just so happens that schneie (who you said is a >>> 'good guy'?) is parroting war propaganda about china? >> >> I made that comment before reading

Re: flexthismotherfucker

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:59:22 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > > > And it also just so happens that schneie (who you said is a > > 'good guy'?) is parroting war propaganda about china? > > I made that comment before reading Schneier's piece. Is he a "good > guy"? I have no