From: Razer
On 11/21/2016 07:35 PM, jim bell wrote:
From: Razer
On 11/21/2016 12:49 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
THIS! "Libertarians see absolutely nothing wrong with the very rich "gaming
the system" for personal advantage in every way that
On 11/21/2016 07:35 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Razer
>
> On 11/21/2016 12:49 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>
> THIS!
> "Libertarians see absolutely nothing wrong with the very rich "gaming
> the system" for personal advantage in every way that having a lot of
> money to
From: Razer
On 11/21/2016 12:49 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
THIS!"Libertarians see absolutely nothing wrong with the very rich "gaming the
system" for personal advantage in every way that having a lot of money to spend
makes possible. "
WRONG! This libertarian, and I
On 11/21/2016 02:39 PM, juan wrote:
> Fascism is cooperation of 'private' industry and government. A
> phenomenom that is obviously rampant in the US.
>
> Other main components of fascism are nationalism and
> militarism. Obviously rampant in the US too.
Another
On 11/21/2016 12:49 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
THIS!
> Libertarians see absolutely nothing wrong with the very rich "gaming
> the system" for personal advantage in every way that having a lot of
> money to spend makes possible. This leaves everyone else on the
> losing end of every deal that was
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:32 AM, John Newman wrote:
> Gotta tumble those coins !
The degree of unlinkability achievable with bitcoin
tumbling is not as high as people might think.
Lots of papers on that.
Plus other hurdles...
- Exchanges ... logs, fees, account locking (theft)
-
let this fucking thread die. Pay your fucking taxes like everyone else and shut
the fuck up no one cares - burn your computer get new hobby it making you sick.
Original Message
On Nov 21, 2016, 12:41 PM, Razer wrote:
On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, jim bell wrote:
From: Steve Kinney On 11/21/2016 01:11 PM, jim bell wrote:
>> In the United States, 500
> billionaires presently own about 1/2 of the capital assets;
>
> Did they obtain them legally or illegally? If illegally, enforce
> the law. If legally, change the laws if
On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> *Below, I posted the entire chart on taxes collected versus position
> in taxpayers.*
Looks good to me if actually correct.
"Tax the rich. Feed the poor. Till there are no rich no more" ~Alvin
Lee, Ten Years After
Next, as long as there IS
The U.S. founders were quite clear in prohibiting income-like distributive
taxes. The saw the peril for what it was: a means to use to pit one
group/clsss against another.
Warrant Canary creator
On Nov 21, 2016 8:38 AM, "jim bell" wrote:
*From:* Razer
From: juan
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:11:11 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>> > Steve Kinney
>> > In the United States, 500
>> > billionaires presently own about 1/2 of the capital assets;
>> Did they obtain them legally or illegally?
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:11:11 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>
>
> > Steve Kinney
> > In the United States, 500
> > billionaires presently own about 1/2 of the capital assets;
> Did they obtain them legally or illegally?
Do you have to ask?
On 21/11/16 15:02, Cannon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
1. I wonder what effects this will have on encryption.
Since encryption cannot be "decrypted on demand" if it is good
encryption, this means that likely true encryption will be banned in UK?
If you get served
From: Steve Kinney
On 11/21/2016 10:02 AM, Razer wrote:
> On 11/20/2016 09:49 PM, jim bell wrote:
>> Oh! I see you are justifying robbing people based on the mere
>> assertion that they can 'afford' it.
>
>
>> No. I justify it on the fact that they're the criminals
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2016 10:02 AM, Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 11/20/2016 09:49 PM, jim bell wrote:
>> Oh! I see you are justifying robbing people based on the mere
>> assertion that they can 'afford' it.
>
>
> No. I justify it on the fact that they're the
On 11/21/2016 08:35 AM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Razer
> On 11/20/2016 09:49 PM, jim bell wrote:
>> >>Oh! I see you are justifying robbing people based on the mere
>> assertion that they can 'afford' it.
> >No. I justify it on the fact that they're the criminals and
From: Razer On 11/20/2016 09:49 PM, jim bell wrote:
>>Oh! I see you are justifying robbing people based on the mere assertion that
>>they can 'afford' it.
>No. I justify it on the fact that they're the criminals and taxes
>appropriately applied are really a form of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
1. I wonder what effects this will have on encryption. Since encryption cannot
be "decrypted on demand" if it is good encryption, this means that likely true
encryption will be banned in UK?
2. And what are the details on allowing hacking, does
On 11/20/2016 09:49 PM, jim bell wrote:
> Oh! I see you are justifying robbing people based on the mere
> assertion that they can 'afford' it.
No. I justify it on the fact that they're the criminals and taxes
appropriately applied are really a form of restitution. If they don't
like it they
On 11/20/2016 09:36 PM, rooty wrote:
> Aff...
So are you Brazilian? Or trying to look like Ceci's clone?
> Original Message
> On Nov 20, 2016, 7:23 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> -- **
> Lauren does it again:
>
> Vote 1, Lauren Weinstein for executive director of
> The
20 matches
Mail list logo