https://arstechnica.com/security/2016/09/linux-kernel-security-needs-fixing/
Based on the number of concurrent discovered bugs, at least a few.
Statistical techniques won't work when it is only discovered bugs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias
But the fact that severe bugs are in a d
I should give some credit to leftist conspiracy twitter, but that might be
problematic. Still, the proof is not hard to find, which just makes it all
rather depressing.
Obviously connection number one is they still are nonprofits. People live
at the mercy of the state to a greater degree than they
> and not to mention the coming tsunami of grossly insecure devices
> that will be hitched to the Internet of Things.
ah cute pentagon propangada - the terrist are gonna attack the
fridges that the fucktards connect to the interwebz
> that will affect the safety and well-being
On 07/15/2017 04:54 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:22:32AM -0400, John Newman wrote:
>> Bugs that already have some PoC or other code to exploit the issue? Or
>> the sum total of all exploitable bugs, discovered and undiscovered?
>>
>> The first case should be relatively
https://arstechnica.com/security/2016/09/linux-kernel-security-needs-fixing/
The Linux kernel today faces an unprecedented safety crisis. Much like when
Ralph Nader famously told the American public that their cars were "unsafe
at any speed" back in 1965, numerous security developers told the 2016
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:22:32AM -0400, John Newman wrote:
> Bugs that already have some PoC or other code to exploit the issue? Or
> the sum total of all exploitable bugs, discovered and undiscovered?
>
> The first case should be relatively small with a very current
> release.. the second case
