According to reputable sources only about 10% of the American colonists
actively took part in the Revolution. Most sat on the sidelines even though
their futures were most uncertain and they new their lives would be forever
changed. Those who opposed the revolt, the Tories, were forced to
Hi,
On 08/06/18 13:06, jim bell wrote:
> I've long believed that AP will "work" if only a few thousand
> well-targeted government employees are killed.
> It's basically a race: If the public is shown good evidence that
> government can be taken down, they will decide that government SHOULD be
>
My comments interspersed
Jim Bell
On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 5:46:29 PM PDT, we...@safe-mail.net
wrote:
>I thought about a way to make an "improvement" on the Jim Bell AP.
I think that this will make it "cheaper", faster and so more effective.
It starts from the
One last thing.
I think that this way is also less violent than the original AP, because after
adding on list the name of all the politicians, all the policemen, all
burocrats, after few deaths, no one will ever want to continue to work for the
state, at least no one of the low grade state
I want to add that this improvement works because who put the money isn't
probably interested on who should die first, every politics should die, the
order isn't really important.
Another good thing about this way it is that if some politicians have some
money shared on their heads, everyone
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 20:06:38 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
> If the public is shown good evidence that government can be taken down, they
> will decide that government SHOULD be taken down.
WHY will they do that? To take down the govt is a purely moral decision
as your use of 'should'
On 08/06/2018 02:03 PM, juan wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 13:36:18 -0700
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>
>> I bet that you use nothing. I mean, damn, you're using a Gmail account.
>
> yes, and I use it to order drugs via tor - after all many 'hidden'
> services admins use their gmail accounts.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 13:36:18 -0700
Mirimir wrote:
> I bet that you use nothing. I mean, damn, you're using a Gmail account.
yes, and I use it to order drugs via tor - after all many 'hidden'
services admins use their gmail accounts. That's how they get caught.
> So maybe living in
On 08/06/2018 01:21 PM, juan wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 12:30:50 -0700
> Mirimir wrote:
>> But seriously, if Tor is just Americunt honeypot, what do _you_ use for
>> anonymity?
>
> whatever I use, or don't use, has exactly FUCK to do with any half
> sensible analysis of the US
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 12:30:50 -0700
Mirimir wrote:
> On 08/06/2018 12:07 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:14:11 -0700
> > Mirimir wrote:
> >
> >> That's a good point about bettors needing good enough anonymity to avoid
> >> arrest. Even so, evidence from .onion marketplaces and child
My comments inline:
On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 9:36:18 PM PDT, Steve Kinney
wrote:
>Listen up you punks...
>I will assume that readers already know how "Assasination Politics"
>a.k.a. AP works. If not, look it up: I consider it a brilliant idea.
>But like many brilliant ideas, one
On 08/06/2018 12:17 PM, juan wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:14:11 -0700
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>
>> Adequate anonymity for assassins is a much harder problem. However,
>> evidence from .onion marketplaces and child porn forums also suggests
>> that Tor would be good enough.
>
> wow - so did
On 08/06/2018 12:17 PM, juan wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:14:11 -0700
> Mirimir wrote:
>> it seems that virtually all busts involved
>> serious OPSEC fails.
>
> oh sorry, got it, when you say "evidence' you mean "the pentagon-tor
> propaganda I parrot"
>
>
>> But of course it's
On 08/06/2018 12:07 PM, juan wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:14:11 -0700
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>> That's a good point about bettors needing good enough anonymity to avoid
>> arrest. Even so, evidence from .onion marketplaces and child porn forums
>> suggests that Tor is good enough for users.
>
>
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:14:11 -0700
Mirimir wrote:
> Adequate anonymity for assassins is a much harder problem. However,
> evidence from .onion marketplaces and child porn forums also suggests
> that Tor would be good enough.
wow - so did you get a bonus from the pentagon? Is that why
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:14:11 -0700
Mirimir wrote:
> That's a good point about bettors needing good enough anonymity to avoid
> arrest. Even so, evidence from .onion marketplaces and child porn forums
> suggests that Tor is good enough for users.
what evidence are you talking about
On 08/06/2018 12:14 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 08/05/2018 09:35 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>> Listen up you punks...
>
> Thanks for that. Overall, it's a great analysis, and I mostly agree.
>
>
>
>> I see anonymity on the networks as nearly always relative and nearly
>> never absolute. To achieve
On 08/05/2018 09:35 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> Listen up you punks...
Thanks for that. Overall, it's a great analysis, and I mostly agree.
> I see anonymity on the networks as nearly always relative and nearly
> never absolute. To achieve absolute anonymity, an individual must
> commit "the
On 31/07/2018 11:16, grarpamp wrote:
infohash:3ae4ba84392687e5ebfe75a9d122d819c61ebd91
Seed moar nao...!
I don't recognize this as a bittorrent magnet link. Presumably it is
hash,but a hash is of limited value except to enable people to share the
information hashed.
Making the plans
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85t9PM9vnk4 #Anonymous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl6DizyZgFY # Blackcoin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09mkaXOWabI # Hiphop the blockchain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Sv8IQzRN74 # Trust the chain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbDHlXj0xrQ # Imogen Heap
20 matches
Mail list logo
