Re: The difference between moderation and censorship [was Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate...]

> Tell us quinn what to do with people like you, who post very > stupid 'defenses' of CENSORSHIP in an allegedly > crypto-anarchist mailing list? He's differentiating between floods of off-topic material which acts to censor real discussion by hiding it in noise vs. removing

Re: "The Tree of Liberty will get its manure..." [Was Re:]

>> Show me the Law(s) that makes it so. > > Guns make it so. Law enforcement owns about 99.9% of all the military > style weaponry. >[...] > We tried voting. > We tried protesting. 1) The protesting you've tried hasn't utilized the strategy of law, only appeals to emotions. 2) The government

Re:

Show me the Law(s) that makes it so. \0x On 9/21/16, Razer <ray...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > On 09/21/2016 11:20 AM, Xer0Dynamite wrote: >> Like Lessig's "Code is Law". LAW is also CODE: it's the Operating >> System for your Government. Presently: b

[no subject]

Like Lessig's "Code is Law". LAW is also CODE: it's the Operating System for your Government. Presently: bloated and with a few design flaws. Fortunately, it's Open Source. Muhahhhwhahaaa \0x

Re: Quantum Computers

On 9/6/16, jim bell wrote: > https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-09-06/quantum-computers-are-coming-the-world-might-not-be-ready?cmpid=yhoo.headline=yahoo > > [partial quote] > Quantum mechanics, Carl Sagan once observed, is so strange that "common > sense is almost

Re: FOR once and FOR ALL

battle that THIS list should worry about as it is/was about the Internet Revolution. Now please give me a report on what you learned in the four texts I linked to you. \0x On 9/3/16, Xer0Dynamite <dreamingforw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or

Re: Continual Violation of List Charter

> We are "anarchists" and we do what we want. Anarchy doesn't scale. What will you expect with billion+ people without societal structure? Watch World War Z and then Book of Eli to find out. The future will probably be some mix of Apocalypse and Enlightenment, with the latter growing over the

FOR once and FOR ALL

Let's get this straight so all you can shut up or put up: There are two futures: one of an Apocalypse or one of Enlightenment. There are four prophesies (two religious and two mystical/new age) and two purely rational arguments why a dramatic and planetary shift MUST and WILL happen in one form