Re: Class War and Capitalism as the revolutionary subject considered harmful

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 20:38 professor rat wrote: > Nothing wrong per se with peasant class war against working class > dictatorships and / or anticapitalism. ( Fuck Bloomberg! Go DIE! ) > > But, taken together and stressed often they mark you out as either a > willing dupe of Marxist

Class War and Capitalism as the revolutionary subject considered harmful

Nothing wrong per se with peasant class war against working class dictatorships and / or anticapitalism.  ( Fuck Bloomberg! Go DIE! ) But, taken together and stressed often they mark you out as either a willing dupe of Marxist Communism , or an actual red-fascist yourself.  And activists

[no subject]

https://www.instagram.com/stories/govkathyhochul/3289088404493363864?utm_source=ig_story_item_share=MXc4YjNxZXNjNjh2Nw==

With offices in Canada, Cali and Israel, Blockstream is subject to the same regulatory regime as Moby.

Drilling down a little on Mobilecoin I noticed several of their top people retweeted a post mentioning ' cypherpunks'. Then Moxie Marlinspike was associated with anarchism for a while.  Makes me wonder if Adam Back isn't providing ' revolutionary ' figleaf cover the way Moxie just did.  Adam

Cryptocurrency: Is The Clean Money, Subject Only To Freedom, Not GovPolCorp Corruption

omes from the interaction between the people who use it. The euro is subject to both constant changes (regular inflation) and traumatic events (devaluations, forced exchange rates, etc.), but these are ignored or otherwise underestimated. People believe they own it, although they can only exchange it f

Just on the subject of APster

I remain platform-agnostic as to whether privatized ' Black-Box APster " kicks off the full global cryptoanarchist revolution or  public-choice ' Soft Drilling ' does the trick.   The main point is it goes viral asap so ' Everyone an assassin ' joins ' Everyone a remailer ", Everyone a Mint ".

Re: (No Subject)

I sent this mail by mistake when I was editing the mail Wrong Adress >

(No Subject)

settings" : { "number_of_shards": 5, "number_of_replicas": 0 }, "mappings": {"leaks": {"properties": { "birthday": { "type": "text", "fields": { "keyword": { "ignore_above": 256, "type": "keyword" } } }, "password_hash": { "type": "text", "fields": { "keyword": { "ignore_above": 256, "type":

Yahoo! subject to the largest data breach on record

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_data_breaches Who does their security?  The THREE STOOGES!?

Change the subject, - talk about the nurturing & children-friendly aspects of crypto

the subject, to talk about the nurturing and children-friendly aspects of crypto https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=cypherpunks%40minder.net=August+2001

[no subject]

> Greg, these complaints seem to fit the disruptive practices of attackers > described here: > > https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm > > Maybe coincidental but not the first to aim at messing with the list. Other > lists have been wiped out with endless bitches, accusations, demand

Re: (No Subject)

Agree, full privacy (including anonymity) is (should be) a foundational Right. Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:31 PM, Bill Roffmann wrote: > The consequences of invention are that some totalitarian

[no subject]

The consequences of invention are that some totalitarian will not like it. They don't want change. The side effect of posting is that one might get doxxed. I think that's why people need cryptography. Because otherwise our privacy would be violated, and we would become easy victims for

Re: (No Subject)

Hey 0xD wat up Original Message On Dec 10, 2019, 5:41 PM, \\0xDynamite wrote: > The censors are now making it difficult for people to edit wikipedia > pages and other mediawiki sites. If you don't believe in their > liberal, gaytheist religion, they bombard you with impossible

[no subject]

The censors are now making it difficult for people to edit wikipedia pages and other mediawiki sites. If you don't believe in their liberal, gaytheist religion, they bombard you with impossible captchas and don't give you linking. \0xD

[no subject]

--Sent from Yandex.Mail for mobile

DMARC + DKIM info for list admins - [sysad...@gnu.org: Fyi: this list, bug-mailutils, just had it's subject [tag] and footer removed]

May be of interest to some... - Forwarded message from sysad...@gnu.org - From: sysad...@gnu.org To: bug-mailut...@gnu.org Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:15:40 -0400 Subject: Fyi: this list, bug-mailutils, just had it's subject [tag] and footer removed List-Id: Bug reports and feature

Re: Are jump if parity flag set instructions subject to speculative execution?

https://github.com/dfd-tud/deda Original Message On Jun 25, 2018, 9:30 PM, Ryan Carboni wrote: > Are jump if parity flag set instructions subject to speculative execution?

Re: Are jump if parity flag set instructions subject to speculative execution?

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:31:14 -0700 Ryan Carboni wrote: > In the era before scientific > investigation, people would have realized there is something wrong with > that picture, but people worship science now beyond all reason, what they worship is scientificism and some mechanical

Re: Are jump if parity flag set instructions subject to speculative execution?

I've been framed for heinous crimes, and denied any ability to disprove them. For reasons not entirely clear to me, the ACLU and the EFF are okay with me being harassed, and I believe my life has been ruined by the government for over a decade, although it would be in the last half I considered it

Are jump if parity flag set instructions subject to speculative execution?

Are jump if parity flag set instructions subject to speculative execution?

What about setting sound subject to political drivel? [was about wifi]

What about setting sound and clear subject to political drivel content? This saves time and electricity.

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

> On Apr 30, 2017, at 12:13 PM, grarpamp wrote: > > Shims are fine for hacks, but few are that. > > qmail has an "installer", but the source needs hacked to properly > [confine] install and run anywhere other than djb's pet /var/qmail . I was going to recommend netqmail,

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

Shims are fine for hacks, but few are that. qmail has an "installer", but the source needs hacked to properly [confine] install and run anywhere other than djb's pet /var/qmail .

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > PINE users from 40 years ago can't seem to give it up, so that works > for some folks - alpine these days I think. Thanks. I'll take a look. > But if you want some really small and light, and still pty based, > Emacs

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 02:40:01AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > qmail had a shitty license, but it was the shit till world > moved on and it went unmaintained. And still probably > nobody offers even the obvious basic TLS IPv6 Unix pipeline? What's wrong with socat / ssh? netcat allowed me to rescue

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Ben Tasker wrote: > Incidentally, mailpile also satisfies Wow! Thanks for mentioning Mailpile. It looks promising. Completely open source with built-in PGP support! I'll give it a try. But now I'm wondering what other FLOSS mail clients

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 11:11 AM, grarpamp wrote: > No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up > the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform > yourself to the awesome. Good old days! > If you're getting too much mail, turn it

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Greg Newby wrote: > Dear colleagues, Thank you for the reply Greg! > A quick FYI, since I am the current list maintainer: > > 1. This field is present in postings, and could be used to filter, or to > munge or otherwise direct or update the

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > Also, Thunderbird + Enigmail = complete and user friendly GPG support > for webmail accounts, with no time consuming failure prone > work-arounds required. Yes. I have been wanting to use GPG keys in Tunderbird using

Re: Mail fetish (was: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default)

[2017-04-29 17:37] Zenaan Harkness > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > > neomutt > > In Debian and derivatives, I think this is called notmuch-mutt > > > maildrop, > > or mailagent (or fdm, which also fetches mail, can't speak to it > though..) > >

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:41 AM, grarpamp wrote: > Users can also fuck around with Thunderbird or Mailpile. > Incidentally, mailpile also satisfies the desired requirement not to have to click into a seperate folder. It uses GMail like labels Has plenty of other drawbacks,

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up > the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform > yourself to the awesome. If you're getting too much mail, turn it into not > much mail with

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

r4 color195 ^From: color header color4 color195 ^To: color header color20 color159 ^Cc: color header color20 color159 ^Bcc: color header color238 color14 ^Reply-To: color header color19 color153 ^Date: color header color19 color153 ^Subject: color body

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:37:38PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:41:46AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > > No, the real standard in use decades before the masses fucked up > > the internet is to use a capable mailer and capable filters and conform > > yourself to the awesome.

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

so slow - ridiculous in this day and age - use mpop or getmail from the ever courteous and supportive Osamu Aoki :) > also fuck around with Thunderbird or Mailpile. If you're using gmail > webinterface, good luck, it's garbage. > > Stuffing bloated redundant meta crap in the subj

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

with Thunderbird or Mailpile. If you're using gmail webinterface, good luck, it's garbage. Stuffing bloated redundant meta crap in the subject line isn't going to happen.

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

verwhelming when I check my mailbox at the >> end of day or after couple of days. >> >> I would like to request the admins/owners to add [Cypherpunks] at the >> beginning of a subject by default to easily spot the mails from >> Cypherpunks list. This can be easily done

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:27:04 -0400 Steve Kinney wrote: > > Bit of fun: GMail's AJAX code repeatedly harvests draft message text > in progress while-u-type, aka almost-realtime-keylogging a feature that makes recovery from a browser > crash without lost work

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

to request the admins/owners to add [Cypherpunks] at the > beginning of a subject by default to easily spot the mails from > Cypherpunks list. This can be easily done by tweaking the appropriate > Mailman settings and I can see that we are using Mailman to manage > this list. > &g

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

t; Hello Vasily! Thanks for the reply. BTW I don't see a single > > reason why would someone get offended. :) > > > >> why don't you tweak your/choose another mail client that can sort > >> messages for you? > > > > As I said may lists follow the practic

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

don't see a single > reason why would someone get offended. :) > >> why don't you tweak your/choose another mail client that can sort >> messages for you? > > As I said may lists follow the practice of prefixing the list name > to subject. It helps in quickly identifyi

Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

hat can sort messages > for you? As I said may lists follow the practice of prefixing the list name to subject. It helps in quickly identifying the message without even clicking on it. Now about tweaking the client, which one do you use which gives the ability to quickly spot the messages just by

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > Why not filter each mailing list to different mailbox? Hey Georgi, I know that we can set filters but thanks for the tip anyways. :) It's just that prefixing a list name seems to be a standard practice. Many lists

Re: Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:15:52AM +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote: > I am subscribed to handful of mailing lists and I'm sure many of you > are too. It gets pretty overwhelming when I check my mailbox at the > end of day or after couple of days. > Why not filter each mailing list to different

Adding [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default

Hello! I am subscribed to handful of mailing lists and I'm sure many of you are too. It gets pretty overwhelming when I check my mailbox at the end of day or after couple of days. I would like to request the admins/owners to add [Cypherpunks] at the beginning of a subject by default to easily

Dozens of iOS TLS-enabled Apps Subject to MITM Attacks

While developing a tool for evaluating mobile application security, researchers at Sudo Security Group Inc. found out something unexpected. Seventy-six popular applications in Apple's iOS App Store, they discovered, had implemented encrypted communications with their back-end services in such a

Re: p2p vs piracy vs corp/gov dictates [was: unchanged generic subject]

from p2p-hackers On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:52 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:13 AM, David Barrett wrote: >> >> My sense is p2p tech is on the downswing, but not forever. With Netflix >> focusing more on original content, Pandora looking

[no subject]

Like Lessig's "Code is Law". LAW is also CODE: it's the Operating System for your Government. Presently: bloated and with a few design flaws. Fortunately, it's Open Source. Muhahhhwhahaaa \0x