Re: Boo!

[rooty]

Wat hi-lar-i-ous

 Original Message 
On Dec 17, 2019, 2:33 PM, Ryan Carboni wrote:

> “Do I know you? I know you clear through. I was born and raised in
> the South, and I’ve lived in the North; so I know the average all
> around. The average man’s a coward. In the North he lets anybody walk
> over him that wants to, and goes home and prays for a humble spirit to
> bear it. In the South one man all by himself, has stopped a stage full
> of men in the daytime, and robbed the lot. Your newspapers call you a
> brave people so much that you think you are braver than any other
> people—whereas you’re just as brave, and no braver. Why don’t your
> juries hang murderers? Because they’re afraid the man’s friends will
> shoot them in the back, in the dark—and it’s just what they would do.
>
> “So they always acquit; and then a man goes in the night, with a
> hundred masked cowards at his back and lynches the rascal. Your
> mistake is, that you didn’t bring a man with you; that’s one mistake,
> and the other is that you didn’t come in the dark and fetch your
> masks. You brought part of a man—Buck Harkness, there—and if you
> hadn’t had him to start you, you’d a taken it out in blowing.
>
> “You didn’t want to come. The average man don’t like trouble and
> danger. You don’t like trouble and danger. But if only half a
> man—like Buck Harkness, there—shouts ’Lynch him! lynch him!’ you’re
> afraid to back down—afraid you’ll be found out to be what you
> are—cowards—and so you raise a yell, and hang yourselves on to that
> half-a-man’s coat-tail, and come raging up here, swearing what big
> things you’re going to do. The pitifulest thing out is a mob; that’s
> what an army is—a mob; they don’t fight with courage that’s born in
> them, but with courage that’s borrowed from their mass, and from their
> officers. But a mob without any man at the head of it is beneath
> pitifulness. Now the thing for you to do is to droop your tails and
> go home and crawl in a hole. If any real lynching’s going to be done
> it will be done in the dark, Southern fashion; and when they come
> they’ll bring their masks, and fetch a man along. Now leave—and take
> your half-a-man with you”—tossing his gun up across his left arm and
> cocking it when he says this.

Boo!

[Ryan Carboni]

“Do I know you?  I know you clear through. I was born and raised in
the South, and I’ve lived in the North; so I know the average all
around. The average man’s a coward.  In the North he lets anybody walk
over him that wants to, and goes home and prays for a humble spirit to
bear it. In the South one man all by himself, has stopped a stage full
of men in the daytime, and robbed the lot.  Your newspapers call you a
brave people so much that you think you are braver than any other
people—whereas you’re just as brave, and no braver.  Why don’t your
juries hang murderers?  Because they’re afraid the man’s friends will
shoot them in the back, in the dark—and it’s just what they would do.

“So they always acquit; and then a man goes in the night, with a
hundred masked cowards at his back and lynches the rascal.  Your
mistake is, that you didn’t bring a man with you; that’s one mistake,
and the other is that you didn’t come in the dark and fetch your
masks.  You brought part of a man—Buck Harkness, there—and if you
hadn’t had him to start you, you’d a taken it out in blowing.

“You didn’t want to come.  The average man don’t like trouble and
danger. You don’t like trouble and danger.  But if only half a
man—like Buck Harkness, there—shouts ’Lynch him! lynch him!’ you’re
afraid to back down—afraid you’ll be found out to be what you
are—cowards—and so you raise a yell, and hang yourselves on to that
half-a-man’s coat-tail, and come raging up here, swearing what big
things you’re going to do. The pitifulest thing out is a mob; that’s
what an army is—a mob; they don’t fight with courage that’s born in
them, but with courage that’s borrowed from their mass, and from their
officers.  But a mob without any man at the head of it is beneath
pitifulness.  Now the thing for you to do is to droop your tails and
go home and crawl in a hole.  If any real lynching’s going to be done
it will be done in the dark, Southern fashion; and when they come
they’ll bring their masks, and fetch a man along.  Now leave—and take
your half-a-man with you”—tossing his gun up across his left arm and
cocking it when he says this.

Re: BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[Razer]

On July 21, 2019 2:13:41 PM PDT, grarpamp  wrote:

>Well, what is it that people should learn and or
>support and or do from reading your linked post?

They should learn to spamcan your replies at the server like I just did and 
save some bandwidth.

I don't now WTF makes you think Youtube is a reliable source of information and 
I don't fucking care. I simply make you vanish. Bye shit-for-brains.


Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail

Re: BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH]

"principled and pragmatic solutions"

Pragmatic == no detectable principles

So, which is it - primciples or pragmatism?

Kurt

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 2:14 PM grarpamp  wrote:
>
> On 7/21/19, Razer  wrote:
> >>> https://www.justsecurity.org/64963/criminal-prosecutions-and-illegal-entry-a-deeper-dive/
> >>> learn something
>
> Well, what is it that people should learn and or
> support and or do from reading your linked post?
>
> Join the US Democratic Party and pray for Hope and Change?
> Join the US Republican Party and their flavor of Freedom?
> Get caught up in game of debating their charade of Fake Laws?
> Keep trying to forcibly make others do what you want,
> where they have applied no such force to you or to others?
>
>
>
> "
> About Us
> Just Security is an online forum for the rigorous analysis of U.S.
> national security law and policy. We aim to promote principled and
> pragmatic solutions to national security problems that decision-makers
> face. Our Board of Editors includes individuals with significant
> government experience, civil society attorneys, academics, and other
> leading voices. Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and
> Security at New York University School of Law.
>
> We are grateful for support from the Open Society Foundations,
> Atlantic Philanthropies, New York University School of Law, and
> individual donors.
>
> The views expressed on this site are attributable to their individual
> authors writing in their personal capacity only, and not to any other
> author, the editors, or any other person, organization or institution
> with which the author might be affiliated or whom the author may
> advise or represent in legal proceedings.
> "

Re: BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[grarpamp]

On 7/21/19, Razer  wrote:
>>> https://www.justsecurity.org/64963/criminal-prosecutions-and-illegal-entry-a-deeper-dive/
>>> learn something

Well, what is it that people should learn and or
support and or do from reading your linked post?

Join the US Democratic Party and pray for Hope and Change?
Join the US Republican Party and their flavor of Freedom?
Get caught up in game of debating their charade of Fake Laws?
Keep trying to forcibly make others do what you want,
where they have applied no such force to you or to others?



"
About Us
Just Security is an online forum for the rigorous analysis of U.S.
national security law and policy. We aim to promote principled and
pragmatic solutions to national security problems that decision-makers
face. Our Board of Editors includes individuals with significant
government experience, civil society attorneys, academics, and other
leading voices. Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and
Security at New York University School of Law.

We are grateful for support from the Open Society Foundations,
Atlantic Philanthropies, New York University School of Law, and
individual donors.

The views expressed on this site are attributable to their individual
authors writing in their personal capacity only, and not to any other
author, the editors, or any other person, organization or institution
with which the author might be affiliated or whom the author may
advise or represent in legal proceedings.
"

Re: BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[Razer]

On July 21, 2019 10:46:18 AM PDT, grarpamp  wrote:

>Lol.
>
>> links
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoSwRoOfb4w
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3niFI0Mas
>
>> You might actually learn something


Iow, I was wrong you're too ignorant to do anything besides watch youtube. Or 
pehaps you're illiterate.

-- Rr
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[grarpamp]

On 7/20/19, Razer  wrote:
> DHS
> National Security
> koncentration kamps
> international law
> protects
> Democratic presidential debates
> Republican National Committee

Lol.

> links

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoSwRoOfb4w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3niFI0Mas

> You might actually learn something

Re: BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[Razer]

JustSecurity is a prime source for factual info related to National Security.

Here. Have a recent article about how the US ended up with kiddie koncentration 
kamps and why ICE is violating international law that protects refugees and 
asylum seekers in quite a few ways. You might actually learn something other 
than how to reactionary-ly fill a post with links.

"Since the first Democratic presidential debates at the end of June, 
candidates, pundits and former government officials have discussed whether 
provisions of law that turn unauthorized border crossing into the federal crime 
of “improper entry” – in addition to a civil immigration law violation – should 
be repealed.

The chair of the Republican National Committee characterized the proposal as a 
call for open borders. Some Obama administration officials have also argued 
against such proposals. Juliette Kayyem, a Department of Homeland Security 
(DHS) official during the Obama administration, asserted that Section 1325 was 
needed to protect borders and deport people. Sarah Saldaña, director of 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during the Obama administration, 
urged the law should stay on the books as a “tool” in the “tool box.” Former 
DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson argued that decriminalizing unauthorized entry was 
tantamount to a declaration that our borders are open.

Much of the debate has unfortunately failed to make clear that, even without 
these criminal laws on the books, the border would still be guarded by Customs 
and Border Patrol (CBP) agents, drones, fencing and (some) wall, and people who 
cross the border without authorization would still be subject to the 
administrative system Congress created to address violations of U.S. 
immigration law. 

For example, they would still be taken into Border Patrol custody, put into the 
administrative deportation system’s proceedings, deported if they are not ruled 
eligible for asylum or other relief, and in the meantime held – often 
unnecessarily – in ICE detention facilities for weeks, months or longer. 

Other laws would still criminalize smuggling, trafficking and a wide range of 
other criminal conduct should a person who crossed the border have committed 
such crimes.

Also absent from much of the debate has been information on how laws that 
criminalize entry and reentry actually work in practice and how they have been 
used to punish asylum seekers and migrants in violation of due process and U.S. 
refugee treaty prohibitions – long before the Trump administration’s zero 
tolerance/family separation fiasco, and continuing to this day..."

https://www.justsecurity.org/64963/criminal-prosecutions-and-illegal-entry-a-deeper-dive/
-- Rr
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[grarpamp]

On 7/20/19, Razer  wrote:
> https://www.justsecurity.org/64968/why-the-ghost-keys-solution-to-encryption-is-no-solution/
> https://www.justsecurity.org/62114/give-ghost-backdoor/
> Give Up the Ghost: A Backdoor by Another Name (Jan 2019)

Weasels trying to NLP their way into your crypto private comms...
https://www.lawfareblog.com/principles-more-informed-exceptional-access-debate
https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-rod-j-rosenstein-delivers-remarks-encryption-united-states-naval
https://www.fbi.gov/news/speeches/raising-our-game-cyber-security-in-an-age-of-digital-transformation

Communicating in absolute secretly in private is natural human
law and thus a right, since million years of human comms,
regardless of now human evolution biological extension into
tech and over distance.

So the correct response is fuck off. Here it is again,
FUCK OFF, F.U.C.K.O.F.F, see real easy,
even the child of a sheep can say it to these fucks.


> National Security

"National security" has been just fine since million
years when human blobs figured out joint defense,
and billion years when bio blobs did too.

Today use of "national security" bleating is FUD speech for
nothing more than "government's survival on top of you slaves".

Fuck that.
Become free.

BOO! "Why the Ghost Keys `Solution’ to Encryption is No Solution"

[Razer]

From justsecurity.org A National Security wonkblog

https://www.justsecurity.org/64968/why-the-ghost-keys-solution-to-encryption-is-no-solution/

Also: Give Up the Ghost: A Backdoor by Another Name (Jan 2019)
https://www.justsecurity.org/62114/give-ghost-backdoor/
Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail

Re: Peek-a-Boo

[jim bell]

 On Monday, January 29, 2018, 10:56:53 AM PST, Steven Schear 
 wrote:
 
 > https://www.zerohedge.com/ news/2018-01-29/fitness- 
 >tracking-app-accidentally- reveals-secret-us-military- bases-cia-black-sites
>An interactive online fitness tracking map published in November of 2017 which 
>compiles a running history of the location and routes of 27 million 
>fitness-device users has unwittingly revealed the location, staffing, patrol 
>routes and layout of U.S. and foreign military bases around the world.



This certainly sounds like a substantial security breach.  However, I also 
wonder if, to a second level, this has been exploited to misdirect.  Could 
somebody have been aware of this, and in REALLY-black sites, they carefully  
protect against such inadvertent disclosures?  Or, perhaps, fake the existence 
of non-existent "sites" that the military wants to pretend to have?  A physical 
honey-pot
                   Jim Bell



  

Peek-a-Boo

[Steven Schear]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-29/fitness-tracking-app-accidentally-
reveals-secret-us-military-bases-cia-black-sites

An interactive online fitness tracking map published in November of 2017
which compiles a running history of the location and routes of 27 million
fitness-device users has unwittingly revealed the location, staffing,
patrol routes and layout of U.S. and foreign military bases around the
world.