Scientists say they've debunked Google’s quantum supremacy claims once and for all
" . . . As reported by Science magazine, the scientists used a system comprised of 512 GPUs to complete the same calculation developed by Google to demonstrate it had passed the quantum supremacy milestone back in 2019. . . " 512 has long seemed to me to place a neat upper-bound on how many folks that can function as an anarchist polity while knowing each other ( with the help of ubiquitous modern technology) " It takes a village " For example, with a global UBI scheme seeking to cover 5 billion or so people, you could start off with 512 sized nodes, each node then deciding its own rules under overall Metcalfes supervision. Then as Moores carries on you could halve each node at regular periods from 256 to 128 and so on. As you approach 8 and less we're presumably close to uploading by then. Quantum cryptoanarchy for every individual and Gym Dumbell's endless FUD being ancient history.
Scientists say they've debunked Google’s quantum supremacy claims once and for all
Scientists say they've debunked Google’s quantum supremacy claims once and for all https://share.newsbreak.com/1joxv01w A team of scientists in China claim to have replicated the performance of Google’s Sycamore quantum computer using traditional hardware, thereby undermining the suggestion the company has achieved quantum supremacy. As reported by Science magazine, the scientists used a system comprised of 512 GPUs to complete the same calculation developed by Google to demonstrate it had passed the quantum supremacy milestone back in 2019. The endeavor was led by statistical physicist Pan Zhang, who said his team’s supercomputer performed the calculation 10 billion times faster than Google had thought possible. Quest for quantum supremacy Quantum supremacy (or quantum advantage) can be defined as the point at which quantum computers can outstrip the maximum potential performance of classical supercomputers in a particular discipline. Three years ago, Google announced it had achieved this feat with Sycamore, which it said took just 200 seconds to complete a statistical mathematics problem that would take a supercomputer 10,000 years to solve. The problem was architected in such a way as to accentuate both the attributes of quantum computers, which exploit a phenomenon known as superposition to speed up calculations, and the limitations of traditional systems.
Re: FOR once and FOR ALL
On 09/03/2016 12:07 PM, Xer0Dynamite wrote: > Then let me tell you: you didn't come from apes -- nobody did. Dude! You insulted my family (guerrillas). Let's box MF! Rr >>> Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or New World Order, also at >>> that site. Either the future is made BY us, or it is destroyed by US. >>> Which is it? >> >> While this may be true, and human / civilization may or may not yet be >> developed enough to be able to think or transcend any given thing, > > Then let me tell you: you didn't come from apes -- nobody did. The > fact that there are "DNA" similarities are because there was a human > BEFORE mammals existed. The reason there is continual turmoil in the > Middle East is because SCIENCE is trying to ERADICATE their TRUTHS. > The all-seeing-eye is not from the same human stock as those of the > West. In fact, there are at least THREE genii of men: homo, hetero, > and amphi sapiens. (Which is probably why they started trying to tack > on a SECOND sapiens onto homo: homo sapiens sapiens). We are NOT > homo (for those of us who come from mothers). > >> just going on about some topic like polical schools of thought, without >> bringing any outcomes back to test and bear on what your're trying to >> transcend, > > Well, now you have it. > >> is offtopic, and isn't going to get you anywhere enlightened anytime soon. > > Better? > > \0x >
Re: FOR once and FOR ALL
On 9/3/16 4:21 PM, John wrote: > > On September 3, 2016 3:07:40 PM EDT, Xer0Dynamite> wrote: Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or New World Order, also at that site. Either the future is made BY us, or it is destroyed by >> US. Which is it? >>> While this may be true, and human / civilization may or may not yet >> be >>> developed enough to be able to think or transcend any given thing, >> Then let me tell you: you didn't come from apes -- nobody did. The >> fact that there are "DNA" similarities are because there was a human >> BEFORE mammals existed. > Had some recent LSD insights or what ? I don't even want to ask where this > nonsense is coming from... Let's just say that breaks with reality are off topic. > > > John > sdw
Re: FOR once and FOR ALL
Oh, and another thing. Just so that we're all clear of the utter stupidity of it all (even though it's mentioned in the links I gave prior): the Internet Revolution was co-opted into the same fucking forces as capitalism in America: GLAM and COMMERCE. Did you notice that the simple O(N^2) value generation of the Net is co-opted into a mere O(N log N) value by network large site co-opting user attention into data silos to hook them in there for advertising revenue? The Net's value originally (back in the late 90's) was scaling value in the order of Reed's Law: super-exponential value generation (O(2^N)) by the addition of creating arbitrary groupings (like this cypherpunks mailing list) on top of the otherwise N^2 value of a effectively fully-connected network. So, graph it out: an 2^N curve versus a N log N curve and watch as the values of N go above 100. THAT is the political battle that THIS list should worry about as it is/was about the Internet Revolution. Now please give me a report on what you learned in the four texts I linked to you. \0x On 9/3/16, Xer0Dynamitewrote: >>> Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or New World Order, also at >>> that site. Either the future is made BY us, or it is destroyed by US. >>> Which is it? >> >> While this may be true, and human / civilization may or may not yet be >> developed enough to be able to think or transcend any given thing, > > Then let me tell you: you didn't come from apes -- nobody did. The > fact that there are "DNA" similarities are because there was a human > BEFORE mammals existed. The reason there is continual turmoil in the > Middle East is because SCIENCE is trying to ERADICATE their TRUTHS. > The all-seeing-eye is not from the same human stock as those of the > West. In fact, there are at least THREE genii of men: homo, hetero, > and amphi sapiens. (Which is probably why they started trying to tack > on a SECOND sapiens onto homo: homo sapiens sapiens). We are NOT > homo (for those of us who come from mothers). > >> just going on about some topic like polical schools of thought, without >> bringing any outcomes back to test and bear on what your're trying to >> transcend, > > Well, now you have it. > >> is offtopic, and isn't going to get you anywhere enlightened anytime >> soon. > > Better? > > \0x >
FOR once and FOR ALL
Let's get this straight so all you can shut up or put up: There are two futures: one of an Apocalypse or one of Enlightenment. There are four prophesies (two religious and two mystical/new age) and two purely rational arguments why a dramatic and planetary shift MUST and WILL happen in one form or another. All this in-fighting is worthless. If you want the good future it will take Truths that you do not yet have or Righteousness for those who have NO voice in the world. These groups are right in America, no need to think they're far off and inaccessible. The experts have been wrong -- all of them. Whether it's medical doctors (who have never made a sane nor healthy world) or scientists (who have not secured a safer future and have wrapped themselves in a elaborate narrative exactly reminiscent of the Allegory of Plato's Cave) or religion (who have never even been held to their own creeds like protecting Earth and Do Not Kill), the failure also lies on all the MASSES (you and me) who have allowed this clusterfuck to happen and continue everyday. You are using your smartphone and sipping coffee to browse the web and be cool, right? All these petty issues like bitcoin and encryption, or occupy and gay rights are so far down the spectrum as to be laughable. The value of cypherpunks is tools for greater activism or personal development, not hiding from the State like little peons, but TRANSCENDING it. Read Hack the Law at hackerspaces wiki or New World Order, also at that site. Either the future is made BY us, or it is destroyed by US. Which is it? \0xDynamite