On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:55:17 +
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> >> And you're conclusion is that they could find a needle of
> >> intelligence in a mountain of hay?
> >
> > what do you mean by 'intelligence'? are you still dreaming of
> > 'terrists'? (though of course you fucking statist americans
>> And you're conclusion is that they could find a needle of intelligence
>> in a mountain of hay?
>
> what do you mean by 'intelligence'? are you still dreaming of
> 'terrists'? (though of course you fucking statist americans are
> terrorists)
I see, the government just might try to acquire
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:58:50 -0600
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
>
> >> Have you ever talked to a high-level government official?
> >
> > No. But I've talked to a lot of lackeys of 'high level
> > officials'.
>
> And you're conclusion is that they could find a needle of intelligence
>
>> No -- even though you haven't told me that you're not educated on the
>> topic, which would make it seem like you can pose as a semi-expert
>> without anyone getting the wise. However, I can tell through analysis
>> of your writing.
>
> lawl - Oh wait - Are you using a super AI to do t
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:48:45 -0600
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> >> Dude, I've done AI -- believe me, they don't know much beyond
> >> keywords. Give me a break. You're still uneducated about it which
> >> makes you an easy victim.
> >
> > okay - your first try might have been because you are
> On Feb 22, 2018, at 3:58 PM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>
> You have a point, but the truth that no one wants to admit is that
> they don't have the resources nor the expertise to create "complete
> global surveillance". Don't get paranoid -- get educated & get HARD.
Which website will get me HARD?
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:31:17 -0600
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> >> You have a point, but the truth that no one wants to admit is that
> >> they don't have the resources nor the expertise to create "complete
> >> global surveillance".
> >
> > of course they do - what do you think the 'artifici
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:58:17 -0600
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> You have a point, but the truth that no one wants to admit is that
> they don't have the resources nor the expertise to create "complete
> global surveillance".
of course they do - what do you think the 'artificial
int
You have a point, but the truth that no one wants to admit is that
they don't have the resources nor the expertise to create "complete
global surveillance". Don't get paranoid -- get educated & get HARD.
The website I gave you will do exactly that.
\0xd
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:32:12 -0600
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> the internet has been effectively turned into the old medium
> JUST AS PREDICTED (by Marshall McLuhan).
not really. The internet is a LOT WORSE than the old medium
since, you know, the internet also implies complete globa
Given the failure of the Internet and the liberal left to produce a
revolution, I offer the following:
http://github.com/thePastor/mayhem
No more internet censorship through invisible spam filters (have you
checked the words they filter on?), in-bound only hypertext websites,
and over-moderation
11 matches
Mail list logo
