Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread Mirimir
On 09/09/2016 11:02 AM, Cypher Piggie wrote: >> Bro, you keep sayin' that ;) >> Got a BTC address or something? > > rickroll mah shit large nigga 121Aspd9j8a6t5G3mCvPS3e5H1p3w6PKj2 Bro, there's nothing there :( I meant an address with at least 100 EUR in it :) Better yet, a suitable escrow

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread Cypher Piggie
> Bro, you keep sayin' that ;) > Got a BTC address or something? rickroll mah shit large nigga 121Aspd9j8a6t5G3mCvPS3e5H1p3w6PKj2

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread Cypher Piggie
> if you want usable list, consider some self-moderation, like not > ( being juan ) juan be addicted to TROLL and other sick things and cannot selfstop till stopped by others

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread Georgi Guninski
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:33:14PM -, Cypher Piggie wrote: > no you stopped reading it because cocksuckers trolls like juan and > zenan the baby filling it up wit jizz > and technically mr cia smart guy if u stopped reading it u wouldnt have > seen the msg u replied to so ur still here

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread Cypher Piggie
> There is a "digest" version that aggregates (all) the messages in to fewer all the message from JUAN TROLL into fewer great big spam msg that is.

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread Cypher Piggie
no you stopped reading it because cocksuckers trolls like juan and zenan the baby filling it up wit jizz and technically mr cia smart guy if u stopped reading it u wouldnt have seen the msg u replied to so ur still here reading it > I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread oshwm
But didnt you just add to that number :D On 9 September 2016 13:03:09 GMT+01:00, d...@geer.org wrote: >I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of >messages. > >Arrivederci

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread dan
I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of messages. Arrivederci

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-09 Thread John Newman
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > >> On 9/2/16 12:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been >>> Don't taint the provenance... just

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-09 Thread Stephen D. Williams
On 9/8/16 7:17 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 09/08/2016 10:03 PM, Mirimir wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 07:39 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > >> On 09/05/2016 12:15 PM, Александр wrote: > > > >> Well that's odd. I wonder what it's about? Splitting the list > >> into what? Two with different themes? One

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-09 Thread Stephen D. Williams
On 9/2/16 12:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >>> will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been >> Don't taint the provenance... just as your archive contains only yours, >> this file should only contain messages from

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 08:26 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote: >> I do think that we ought to implement some form of AP. But proof > > 100euro on juan and his ops Bro, you keep sayin' that ;) Got a BTC address or something?

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-08 Thread Cypher Piggie
> I do think that we ought to implement some form of AP. But proof 100euro on juan and his ops

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-08 Thread Cypher Piggie
> uff that Александр and > Zenaan are > posting. these duds adn a few other and that fucko troll JUAN are worthlesss circlejerkin each other partly tricked into ut by TROLL Juanz ops rest by own dumbasses

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-08 Thread Steve Kinney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/08/2016 10:03 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/08/2016 07:39 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: >> On 09/05/2016 12:15 PM, Александр wrote: >> Well that's odd. I wonder what it's about? Splitting the list >> into what? Two with different themes? One

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-08 Thread Razer
On 09/08/2016 07:03 PM, Mirimir wrote: > > There are many lists out there for stuff that Александр and Zenaan are > posting. It's not that cypherpunk is apolitical. Rather, it's that stuff > which simply bashes one side or the other, but has no particular > connection to crypto and its

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 07:42 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > Greetings, Anarchists and Sworn Enemies Of Anarchism! > > Without a sovereign Authority to sign off on it, there can be no > such thing as a CPunks List Charter. What it this, a corporation? > CPunks has never even been as organized as a pirate

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 07:39 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 09/05/2016 12:15 PM, Александр wrote: >> forwarding part of my private conversation to the whole list: > >> The new list is not the preferable solution, you know. It's the >> only thing we see right now, but... We should realize, that this >>

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-08 Thread Steve Kinney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, Anarchists and Sworn Enemies Of Anarchism! Without a sovereign Authority to sign off on it, there can be no such thing as a CPunks List Charter. What it this, a corporation? CPunks has never even been as organized as a pirate vessel - no

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-08 Thread Steve Kinney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/05/2016 12:15 PM, Александр wrote: > forwarding part of my private conversation to the whole list: > > The new list is not the preferable solution, you know. It's the > only thing we see right now, but... We should realize, that this >

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-08 Thread Me
Agreed. On September 5, 2016 11:15:49 AM CDT, "Александр" wrote: >forwarding part of my private conversation to the whole list: > >The new list is not the preferable solution, you know. It's the only >thing >we see right now, but... We should realize, that this splitting up

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-05 Thread Александр
forwarding part of my private conversation to the whole list: The new list is not the preferable solution, you know. It's the only thing we see right now, but... We should realize, that this splitting up will KILL the original list. It will kill the whole concept and the core idea of the

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-04 Thread Riad S. Wahby
Bardi Harborow wrote: > The lack of SPF, DKIM and DMARC records, as well as TLS, on the new > list is still wreaking havoc with my spam filter. Any chance of a fix? > I'd be happy to provide assistance. I'm guessing the big change since we moved the list is TLS. SPF is

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-04 Thread Александр
2016-09-05 0:21 GMT+03:00 Zenaan Harkness : > CCing Juan and Alex now - what do you guys think? I already told you a year ago, brother, that i am FOR this idea. In my opinion, it *must* be done, because the tension from the crypto-freaks and golden caged morrons is all the

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-04 Thread Razer
On 09/04/2016 08:28 PM, Bardi Harborow wrote: > The lack of SPF, DKIM and DMARC records, as well as TLS, on the new > list is still wreaking havoc with my spam filter. Any chance of a fix? > I'd be happy to provide assistance. > Yours sincerely, > > Bardi Harborow > Software Engineer > Mobile:

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-04 Thread Bardi Harborow
The lack of SPF, DKIM and DMARC records, as well as TLS, on the new list is still wreaking havoc with my spam filter. Any chance of a fix? I'd be happy to provide assistance. Yours sincerely, Bardi Harborow Software Engineer Mobile: +61481816153 Web: bardiharborow.com I acknowledge the

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-03 Thread Georgi Guninski
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:33:33PM +0200, Tom wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:08:39AM -0700, Razer wrote: > > I just took a look at the Wikipedia entry for 'greylisting'. It sounds > > awful if you're victimized by it. My personal mail from openmailbox to a > > friend was rejected by yahoo b/c

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread Razer
On 09/02/2016 08:33 AM, Tom wrote: > Obviously you've never operated an email server. HEY YOU WIN THE FUCKING PRIZE! I've been victimized by an op though. LOTS of people have. Email relay operators are right in there with the "Official Observers" on amateur radio when it comes to CENSORSHIP.

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread Dan White
On 09/02/16 08:08 -0700, Razer wrote: On 09/02/2016 04:41 AM, Greg Newby wrote: One difference from the old domain is that greylisting is turned on. I haven't heard of that creating problems, but it is a difference. - Greg I just took a look at the Wikipedia entry for 'greylisting'. It

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:10:44AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Finally - can the new cpunks admin please add a standard > > subscribe/unsubscribe footer? > > No. Same goes for list tagging subject. They're apologist crap

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread grarpamp
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Finally - can the new cpunks admin please add a standard > subscribe/unsubscribe footer? No. Same goes for list tagging subject. They're apologist crap excuse for crap users that bloats out everyone else. Bad enough

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > > will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been > > Don't taint the provenance... just as your archive contains only yours, > this file should only contain messages from newby's server: >

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-01 Thread grarpamp
> will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been Don't taint the provenance... just as your archive contains only yours, this file should only contain messages from newby's server: https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks.mbox/cypherpunks.mbox.gz You can host your own

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-01 Thread Riad S. Wahby
Greg Newby wrote: > As I just wrote, this message should be going out via the > *new* server and settings. It's addressed to cypherpunks at > lists.cpunks.org, as opposed to the regular address, cypherpunks > at cpunks.org Folks, If all has gone well, this message will reach you via the new

List moved to new home (Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent)

2016-08-31 Thread Greg Newby
Dear colleagues, The cypherpunks email list is now moved to a new server. You will notice messages are from @lists.cpunks.org Mail to cypherpu...@cpunks.org gets forwarded to cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org, so there is nothing you need to do: both addresses work, and are anticipated to keep

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

2016-08-29 Thread Stephen D. Williams
I just finally refreshed this for my server. These instructions and test reflector were extremely helpful. https://www.linode.com/docs/email/postfix/configure-spf-and-dkim-in-postfix-on-debian-8 sdw On 8/29/16 9:11 PM, Bardi Harborow wrote: > The mail server doesn't appear to use TLS when

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-08-29 Thread Bardi Harborow
The mail server doesn't appear to use TLS when forwarding mail to subscribers. Additionally you may wish to look at configuring SPF, DKIM and DMARC records. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Greg Newby wrote: > As I just wrote, this message should be going out via the *new*