On 2/19/22, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I wanted to present a way for people within the EU
> to have an option to phase out the old and non
> reliable and non trustworthy WoT, which can't, as
> you know, not been used for businesses, contracts etc.
It's great you guys are mainstreaming
anyway like, clearly you have more experience with cryptography than
me, i should probably consider you a good person to have the public
key of
On 2/19/22, Stefan Claas wrote:
> The reason why I did it this way with a certificate:
>
> To have a *proof* of ownership and option that it
> is me who did that and the blockchain helps to
> undermine that, because at the timestamping service
> I am registered and log in there via Gmail.
>
> My
On 2/19/22, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> the certified document's hash is in three blockchains,
> Bitcoin, ETH and Aion, which you can easily verify.
> And I did not payed any cent for the transactions.
>
> Regards
> Stefan
But why not use a direct document hash that can be verified if you