Original Message On Jan 21, 2018, 3:27 PM, Zenaan Harkness
wrote: On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:44:11PM -0800, Ryan Carboni wrote: > Everyone
knows about my case, and in silent remarks, dismiss it because I > must be evil
incarnate to a cartoonish level. A worthy cause only be worthy due to the
challenge inherent in standing for that which you believe. (BTW, thank you -
taking any stand in this day an age is a rare thing, well appreciated by a few,
and despite the fact that there are abundant opportunities to those inclined to
take some stand, any stand.) > I began pointing out obvious deductions about
the world for the sole reason > of gaining positive notoriety, without
feedback, I had no idea I was > accomplishing nothing. Welcome to the world of
humans. Achieving anything can be a challenge indeed. Most often soul
searching, and thus if you're lucky a deeper connection with yourself, is the
sole result; the road less travelled is its own reward, as tough as it usually
is. I am grateful that I was not in Seth Rich's position - all in all I rather
appreciate my own life and am happy I still inhabit this physical body. >
Obviously random people coming in out of the blue > generally aren't trusted
with exceptional claims. Yes, generally true. But here's perhaps the crux for
you - what, at any particular point in time, are you wishing to achieve? This,
your email to which I respond, makes no call to action (not even "stand strong
and leak my brothers, sisters, hermaphrodites and the rest". And if you wish to
build cred, there presumably must be a point to doing so - and it is only you
who can decide on those points of significance from which you impel yourself in
action pursuant to your will. Good luck. I guess. > Guantamano Bay prison is
illegal in the eyes of many, despite government > officials basing their
conclusion on classified evidence. > > I don't know what anyone is arguing for,
they all really seem to have only > picked a side and decided to spout words
with no real meaning attached to > them. "they" is a word I use too often
myself. It rarely gets us very far in the conversation... > What I have been
accused of Look, anonymity is a double edged sword - you can lurk in the
shadows of your current nom de plume or sock puppet (Shawn K Quiss My Ass comes
to mind :D ), BUT, a whiny sock puppet ain't gonna get much traction I'm
afraid. For example, I don't know you from a bar of soap (hmm, that phrase
takes on new meaning in the face of the alt-right rightwards move to the right
- did I mention right?), but if I take a stab and search for "outing of "lucky
winner" by "the intercept"", the first link is this:
http://scammer.net.ee/the-intercept-outs-their-source-to-the-feds-reality-winner_a30a583d0.html
and this seems to be the tldr: It appears a journalist from the left leaning
publication "The Intercept" has outed their source - Reality Winner- to the
feds. She faces at least 10 years in prison if found guilty of leaking top
secret info. WikiLeaks offers $10,000 reward for the public exposure and
termination of the journalist that outed her. OK so leaking to The Man was may
be not have been such a great idea? - perhaps next time (in 10 years time if
you're unlucky, zero years time if you're lucky) try figuring out how to
anonymously get your leak to the public generally, via dark webski (Tor, I2P,
others?) or just some random "CD + letter" letterbox drops, or hell I don't
know, may be try Wikileaks already? > is fundamentally incompatible with my >
psychological makeup, and I wish to prove it with an EEG or some other > test.
So go find a suitable psychiatrist or "Intelligence Community" professional. To
be really honest, looking above, I've been trying to read between the lines,
but seriously, I don't know if my assumptions are true, false, or some way
inbetween. > There is no way to see into other men's hearts, or minds, but
there > are close enough ways. > > I am innocent. I am invoking my rights as a
human being born in the United > States, I have been harassed and my life
sabotaged by the US government, I > am wholly dependent on my parents, and they
have been convinced by a > psychiatrist who is in violation of the Hippocratic
Oath. I have for the > longest time wondered why the government would act so
boldly against me. I > cannot convince anyone to take any action that would
change my situation > one iota. How is your pen name "Ryan", and the paucity of
facts in your email, and the lack of any real call for help, supposed to
encourage anyone to help you? Are you trying to say you're aggrieved? Are you
wanting us to rage emotionally at the heart dropping inhumanity of the state?
Well, I empathize. > If you want me to decode typical Schnidler: >
http://observer.com/2017/12/james-clapper-tells-cnn-donald-trump-is-vladimir-putins-kremlin-asset/
> Spy bosses are by nature the most tight-lipped of people. Those who head
