Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On 9/6/16, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/06/2016 05:44 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: >> Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls? >> >> I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it >> appears to support this. I never received Georgi's original e

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:10:55PM -0700, Razer wrote: > > > On 09/06/2016 05:24 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:44:14AM -0700, Razer wrote: > >> I've already noted attempts to use common psycho-emotional traits of > >> activists as an attempt to glean info about myself.

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On 09/06/2016 05:24 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:44:14AM -0700, Razer wrote: >> I've already noted attempts to use common psycho-emotional traits of >> activists as an attempt to glean info about myself. I'M NOT providing >> any further details > > Well done! That's a

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On Sep 6, 2016 9:24 PM, "Zenaan Harkness" wrote: > > Oh Georgi, dunno for sure, but I would not ordinarily have named CIA operatives as "trolls", more like marauding adventurers, clamouring for the next sovereign nation overthrow (the next Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Brazil...) > > They get paid too

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:44:14AM -0700, Razer wrote: > I've already noted attempts to use common psycho-emotional traits of > activists as an attempt to glean info about myself. I'M NOT providing > any further details Well done! That's a great place to get to :) Sticks and stones..

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

(PS: May be check your whitelisting - this email landed in spam, with a few others, due to the new list domain...) On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 06:01:41AM -0600, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/06/2016 05:44 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > > Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls? > >

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On 09/06/2016 10:33 AM, Jason McVetta wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Georgi Guninski > wrote: > > I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it > appears to support this. > > > Where did you hear said claim? > > > > I

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it > appears to support this. > Where did you hear said claim? > I don't see enough "value" in the list for such attack, Alternatively, one could take that as (weak) eviden

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/06/2016 07:44 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls? > > I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it > appears to support this. > > Why so? > > I don

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On 09/06/2016 05:01 AM, Mirimir wrote: > On 09/06/2016 05:44 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: >> Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls? >> >> I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it >> appears to support this. > > That makes about

Re: Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

On 09/06/2016 05:44 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls? > > I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it > appears to support this. That makes about as much sense as anything else, I guess ;) But what evidence do yo

Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls?

Why could this list be a target for (paid) trolls? I hear that this list is target of (paid) trolls and browsing it appears to support this. Why so? I don't see enough "value" in the list for such attack, short of just propaganda playground.