On Monday, October 1, 2001, at 09:04 PM, Steve Schear wrote:
As Tim and others have pointed out oil only looks cheap if all the costs
are not exposed at the pump.
Gee, I recall making a much different point. I recall disputing the
claim that the real, unsubsidized price of oil is $10 a
Somebody on the list, promoting a total boycott of Oracle,
quoted Larry Ellison as saying:
We need a database behind that, so when you're walking into an airport
and you say that you are Larry Ellison, you take that card and put it
in a reader and you put your thumb down and that system confirms
Title: Guy's Wit's End
Guy's
Wit's End
9
Inch Rear Ends
CONTACT
GUY'S
WIT'S END
http://www.guyswitsend.webhop.net
Guy
Nancy Thorpe
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Steve Schear wrote:
At 01:25 PM 10/1/2001 -0400, James B. DiGriz wrote:
Declan McCullagh wrote:
A far more productive application of corporate welfare would be if that
money were spent on engineering research and development of geosynchronous
solar power microwave
Dear Friend,
I have lost 20 pounds in the last 30 days. I knew that after we'd spent so
much time and wasted a lot of money on useless diet products that you'd be
eager to hear about my success. I've finally discovered a great product and it really
works like it says it's going to! This
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 16:30:17 -0400
From: Kirk Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SF development
I don't know what happened to Brian however as far as I know John
Walker is still lurking. Development is
Eugene Leitl wrote:
Problem is high LEO launch costs. It would seem easier to build automated
and teleoperate fabbing and (linear motor) launching facilities on Luna,
and circularize orbit mostly by aerobraking.
And if you can put up a bloody huge enough launcher on the moon, (use
solar
/internal passport.
Peter Trei
---
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011002/us/attacks_customs_2.html
Tuesday October 2 3:33 AM ET
Customs Wants Lists of Passengers
By JEANNINE AVERSA, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Airlines should be required to turn
Nomen wrote:
According to collected data, the average speed in 30 mph zones ranged
from 35.5 to 46 mph. In the 35 mph zones, the average speed was about 43
mph. The highest speed, clocked by Colonial Estates East Citizens on
Patrol group, was 62 mph in a 30 mph zone.
Too bad this wasn't
At 09:52 AM 10/2/01 -0400, Lyle Seaman wrote:
Since we know that these terrorists use steganography, they could be sending
messages hidden in the contents of the letters, classifieds, or even the
editorial
page.
Therefore, the solution is clear.
All printed matter must be reviewed by a team of
At 02:00 PM 10/2/01 +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
And if you can put up a bloody huge enough launcher on the moon, (use
solar energy or nuclear - why not - it is one place in the system that
we don't care about pollution) then you can send material back all the
way to LEO by slingshot, and when it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 06:00 am, Ken Brown wrote:
Eugene Leitl wrote:
Problem is high LEO launch costs. It would seem easier to build automated
and teleoperate fabbing and (linear motor) launching facilities on Luna,
and circularize orbit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 07:43 am, David Honig wrote:
At 02:00 PM 10/2/01 +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
And if you can put up a bloody huge enough launcher on the moon, (use
solar energy or nuclear - why not - it is one place in the system that
we
At 08:12 AM 10/2/01 -0700, Matt Beland wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 07:43 am, David Honig wrote:
At 02:00 PM 10/2/01 +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
And if you can put up a bloody huge enough launcher on the moon, (use
solar energy or nuclear - why
So if someone goes to your site, the FTC can tell you how to
communicate? Or only if your site's DNS entry is hamming-close
to another? Or only if you're communicating unPC (e.g., erotica)
content?
And how does bombarding them with ads differ from spam, which
has been 1st-amend. protected so
At 01:14 PM 10/2/2001 +0200, Eugene Leitl wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Steve Schear wrote:
At 01:25 PM 10/1/2001 -0400, James B. DiGriz wrote:
Declan McCullagh wrote:
A far more productive application of corporate welfare would be if that
money were spent on engineering research and
Once the catcher is high enough it ought to be possible to set the
launcher so that missed catches zip round Earth head out. After all,
at Lunar OV it wants to be in a high orbit. Achieving re-entry
through Earth's atmosphere - sorry that should be entry it wasn't here
in the first place -
An Metet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Nomen wrote:
According to collected data, the average speed in 30 mph zones ranged
from 35.5 to 46 mph. In the 35 mph zones, the average speed was about 43
mph. The highest speed, clocked by Colonial Estates East Citizens on
Patrol group, was 62 mph in a
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:29:31AM -0700, David Honig wrote:
So if someone goes to your site, the FTC can tell you how to
communicate? Or only if your site's DNS entry is hamming-close
to another? Or only if you're communicating unPC (e.g., erotica)
content?
And how does bombarding them
It's nice that the proposal has a sunset clause in it,
to limit the amount of time that we're subject to the
various good or bad half-baked suggestions and the various
agencies' requests for powers they've always wanted.
Expect that the worst parts will get extended indefinitely over the years
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice that the proposal has a sunset clause in it,
to limit the amount of time that we're subject to the
various good or bad half-baked suggestions and the various
agencies' requests for powers they've always wanted.
Expect
C'punks,
Fox News had a retired general on to discuss the purported billion dollar
bounty on Bin Laden. His take was predictable. He was afraid that
mercenaries would get in the way of government efforts to get OBL. Of
course, he never consider that the government efforts might get in the way
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:09:50PM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
It's nice that the proposal has a sunset clause in it,
to limit the amount of time that we're subject to the
various good or bad half-baked suggestions and the various
agencies' requests for powers they've always wanted.
Expect
Title: New Page 1
Create
Your Own Opt-In E-mail List
Don't
Buy List! CREATE YOUR OWN!
Advertising
your company, products or services on the Internet is a must. Using Bulk
E-mail is an option you may have used or considered. This sort of advertising
has
On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 05:56 PM, Steve Schear wrote:
Princeton University has for a while been host to a number of
computerized
studies of random number generators. The Princeton Engineering Anomalies
Research Lab (PEAR) is one. Another of them is the Global Consciousness
Project
On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 06:04 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
Tim May wrote:
I know that I if I am ever stopped for photographing a dam or a bridge
I hope I'll have the courage to tell the cop to fuck off. If arrested
on such a bogus charge, things will escalate dramatically and I would
Hmm, I get a Cannot Find server or DNS error
I tried from work, and I tried it from home.
Unless John had to ban both due to robot issues.
Oh well.
I felt a great disturbance in the Force . . . as if millions of voices suddenly cried
out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.
Tim May wrote:
On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 06:04 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
Tim May wrote:
I know that I if I am ever stopped for photographing a dam or a bridge
I hope I'll have the courage to tell the cop to fuck off. If arrested
on such a bogus charge, things will escalate
There have been a half dozen folks who said today they could
not access Cryptome, but it's accessible from here. And there
are only a half dozen blocks of rampaging bots.
However, we are in the process of switching the archives
to new machines and IP address changes are in the works
--
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:49:34PM +, Ian Goldberg wrote:
Note that (if I'm reading it right) the sunset only applies to Title I
(the Internet surveillance bits), and not, for example, to the hacking
is terrorism bits in Title III (section 309). The sunset also applies
Ian: I think
I wrote in January about a Capitol Police (federal) cop telling
me I couldn't take a photo of the Capitol building from
a public sidewalk:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-01636.html
Not an urban legend.
-Declan
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:47:02PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't there cases
Tim May wrote:
Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, and the C. in general. There certain is
no requirement to cooperate.
Where to do otherwise intelligent people pick up these bizarre ideas?
Probably because of all the heretofore unheard of things happening to
people in the courts these
I can't reach it from here either, and doing a nslookup on
cryptome.org comes back with nothing.
--
Harmon Seaver, MLIS
CyberShamanix
Work 920-203-9633
Home 920-233-5820
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cybershamanix.com/resume.html
There are numerous changes in PATRIOT from MATA and ATA,
and it has over twice their length. It still uses the same
obfuscation style of burying dozens of proposals as modifications
of existing legislation, making it hard to understand what is
being proposed without jigsaw puzzling the pieces
On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 06:28 PM, Neil Johnson wrote:
Hmm, I get a Cannot Find server or DNS error
I tried from work, and I tried it from home.
Unless John had to ban both due to robot issues.
Oh well.
You sure you're entering cryptome.org, and not cryptome.com?
I jut tried
I've just tried it from a server in MN, and another one in AL,
and, previously, from here in WI.
Nada -- it doesn't exiest anymore.
can't find cryptome.org: Non-existent host/domain
--
Harmon Seaver, MLIS
CyberShamanix
Work 920-203-9633
Home 920-233-5820
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep, http://cryptome.org
The IP address that John sent DOES work, so it is looking like an DNS issue.
-Neil
- Original Message -
From: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: cryptome down ?
On Tuesday, October 2, 2001,
Agreed. It is a DNS issue.
nslookup from one box without cryptome.org cached gives me:
can't find cryptome.org: Non-existent host/domain
John might want to temporarily redirect cryptome.org to the IP address
(if his setup allows him to) so people get the hint, and make a note
of the IP address
jya.com is fine, cryptome.org's dns servers haven't updated. You might
well be using old BIND zone files, if your version of BIND was upgraded,
make sure you check the SOA section of the zone file, as with newer
versions different syntax was used, check out your logs for named errors
on startup.
John Young wrote:
USA. USA.
Remember, do not say out loud, fuck that. Think abou it,
then decide to self-suppress for a couple of years, then
a couple more, then more after that. It's a long, long campaign
the leaders warn, just like their predecessors said the main
enemy is within.
PGP creator defends right to encrypt emails against calls for a ban
By Mike Ingram
1 October 2001
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/pgp-o01.shtml
[ Home page: http://www.wsws.org/index.shtml ]
Philip Zimmermann, the creator of Pretty Good Privacy (PGP)
encryption software, has issued a
Both ns1.secure.net and ns2.secure.net are returning SERVFAIL for A
record queries for cryptome.org. That almost certainly indicates a
misconfiguration on those two machines. John, you may want to start
harassing your new provider to fix this.
Alternatively, it could be that those two servers
I tried to get to cryptome, but it appears to be down.
Any info ?
-
Neil M. Johnson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't you hate it when the issues are tangled. It would much nicer if
there were a clean and simple case of free speech but no, it has to be
impure. OTOH the police could be lying about the firecracker and the
struggle knowing that the Constitutional issue is clear ( today anyway )
and wanting to
There have been several panicky calls that Arabs were seen at national
tourist spots, including photographing the Hoover Dam. Some on Usenet
are calling for steps to crack down on these photographers.
This is an article I wrote for Usenet:
This is not the Soviet Union. Anyone may photograph
on Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:11:19PM -0500, Neil Johnson
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I tried to get to cryptome, but it appears to be down.
Any info ?
Works from here.
--
Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of Gestalt don't you understand?
47 matches
Mail list logo
