of anonyms.
Zero cost is not required, of course, except to make anonymity, err,
zero cost.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 12:06 AM +0100 on 7/1/02, Ben Laurie wrote:
No, a pseudonym can be linked to stuff (such as reputation,
publications, money). An anonym cannot.
More to the point, there is no such thing as an anonym, by definition.
Hmm. So present the appropriate definition?
Cheers
of anonyms.
Zero cost is not required, of course, except to make anonymity, err,
zero cost.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
Barney Wolff wrote:
A pseudonym that I can give up at will and that can never afterwards
be traced to me is equivalent to an anonym.
No, a pseudonym can be linked to stuff (such as reputation,
publications, money). An anonym cannot.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
dmolnar wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Greg Newby wrote:
the next couple of days. I'm thinking of a CP
meet Saturday night July 12. Anyone else gonna be there?
I should be there, since I'm free and in the area.
In a similar vein, who's going to be at DEF CON?
Me :-)
Cheers,
Ben
dmolnar wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Greg Newby wrote:
the next couple of days. I'm thinking of a CP
meet Saturday night July 12. Anyone else gonna be there?
I should be there, since I'm free and in the area.
In a similar vein, who's going to be at DEF CON?
Me :-)
Cheers,
Ben
should be online within
the next couple of days. I'm thinking of a CP
meet Saturday night July 12. Anyone else gonna be there?
Woah! Me! By a miracle! Not at H2K2 (well, until now, I hadn't heard
about it), but I will be in NY, en route back to the UK (on Sunday).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http
Jason Holt wrote:
Are the journals going to be snippy about
copyright issues?
Most journals don't like papers to have been published elsewhere first.
Screw 'em, I say.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can
/), though it
seems to have moved on some since I last looked...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
/), though it
seems to have moved on some since I last looked...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
it.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
)
and BACS (Bank Automated Clearing System).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
transactions are
actually related to anything real. The other 98% are just banks playing
gambling games on the money markets.
Scary, if you ask me.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
. But because it works we don't hear about it
much.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
transactions are
actually related to anything real. The other 98% are just banks playing
gambling games on the money markets.
Scary, if you ask me.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
machines inside your firewall advertise services is a
fantastically huge security hole.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
machines inside your firewall advertise services is a
fantastically huge security hole.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
another list.
What say ye, Eurotrash?
Wouldn't get me anywhere, since I'd be on both lists...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert
another list.
What say ye, Eurotrash?
Wouldn't get me anywhere, since I'd be on both lists...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert
of seconds, but still well within user tolerance. I suspect
additional optimizations are possible which would decrease the lag
further.
Numbers like a couple of seconds would kill HTTPS stone dead, of
course.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net
/399315a0_fs.html
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
inequality definitively cannot be explained
by hidden variables, hence the whole action-at-a-distance thing.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit
gfgs pedo wrote:
hi,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Apr 2002 at 0:08, Ben Laurie wrote:
Oh surely you can do better than that - making it
hard to guess the seed
is also clearly a desirable property (and one that
the square root rng
does not have).
U can choose any
the seed
is also clearly a desirable property (and one that the square root rng
does not have).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
. So it has an
inherent lack of anonymity which is not present in an online system.
If they withdraw blinded coins, then although they were identified they are not
linked with the coins. Did I miss something?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net
. So it has an
inherent lack of anonymity which is not present in an online system.
If they withdraw blinded coins, then although they were identified they are not
linked with the coins. Did I miss something?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net
in plain, surely?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
subscribe cypherpunks-moderated
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
Thank you for emailing me with your thoughts and comments. Due to the high
volume of emails that I receive daily, I can only respond to those emails
I receive from Maryland residents.
If you are a Maryland resident and you included your name and FULL postal
mailing address in your email, you
' keys?
Using remailer clients should be *easy*. Saying this is too hard for the
average spammer to figure out isn't acceptable.
In fact, spammers currently *do* send mail encrypted to the remailers'
keys. It's a pain in the ass trying to filter the damn stuff out.
Ben Xain
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 December 2001, Peter Trei wrote:
Ben Xain[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
In fact, spammers currently *do* send mail encrypted to the remailers'
keys. It's a pain in the ass trying to filter the damn stuff out.
First I've heard that. Frankly, I'm suprised.
One solution, which I've long
be confirmed?
Or maybe there is some other way to cut down on cheating.
Ben Xain
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: FREE Computer With Merchant Account Setup
COMPLETE CREDIT CARD PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR YOUR BUSINESS. INTERNET - HOME
BASED - MAIL ORDER - PHONE ORDER
Do you accept credit cards? Your competition does!
Everyone Approved - Credit Problems OK!
Approval in less than 24 hours!
should continue
to be able to demonstrate that fact.
Rights management can only be done by legal and social means, not
technological ones.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert
Bram Cohen wrote:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Ben Laurie wrote:
Since we're in hair-splitting mode, I should point out that "prevents
the denial of an act" is not equivalent to a "negation that something is
false". Of course, logically, it comes to the same thing,
Has anyone been able to figure out where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is posted as an
address to get info about explosives? A quick check on altavista and google
turned up nothing.
Ben
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
