New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread Tim May
Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 messages in my Cypherpunks filtered mailbox. So I looked at what the cat drug in: -- 29 messages from Choate, the usual forwarded Slashdot, kuroshin, CNN, Register articles

RE: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread Trei, Peter
Tim May[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 messages in my Cypherpunks filtered mailbox. So I looked at what the cat drug in: -- 29 messages from Choate, the usual forwarded

Re: CDR: RE: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread measl
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Trei, Peter wrote: mattd has actually improved slightly as well - some of his messages are actually on-topic, and reference other's postings appropriately. It's been a full week since he's called for my violent death. An entire *week*? Naw. Not possible... If not

Re: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread j eric townsend
At 09:29 -0800 2002/03/15, Tim May wrote: Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 messages in my Cypherpunks filtered mailbox. So I looked at what the cat drug in: Here's an idea -- why not use whatever you use to

Re: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread Tim May
On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 02:43 PM, j eric townsend wrote: At 09:29 -0800 2002/03/15, Tim May wrote: Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 messages in my Cypherpunks filtered mailbox. So I looked at what the

Re: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread Tim May
On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 08:14 PM, John Young wrote: J. Eric wrote: Here's an idea -- why not use whatever you use to filter things into your cypherpunks mailbox to first filter out anything from people you don't want to read instead of whining to everyone on the list about how much

Re: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread John Young
J. Eric wrote: Here's an idea -- why not use whatever you use to filter things into your cypherpunks mailbox to first filter out anything from people you don't want to read instead of whining to everyone on the list about how much they send that you don't want to read? This appears sound at

Re: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread matthew X
No you drop me a line you may be the bastarded who killed my wife and kids. On 15 Mar 2002 at 14:43, j eric townsend wrote: At 09:29 -0800 2002/03/15, Tim May wrote: Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16

Re: New heights of spam from Choate and MattX

2002-03-15 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 05:28 PM 3/15/02 -0800, Tim May wrote: rest of drug-addled gibberish elided Hey, with all of the folks offering reformatted repostings of rehashed repeats of old news here, can't anybody offer to translate this architect/nutcase guy's posts from his internal crackpipe lingo into something