Nomen Nescio wrote:
Carl Ellison suggested an alternate way that TCPA could work to allow
for revoking virtualized TPMs without the privacy problems associated
with the present systems, and the technical problems of the elaborate
cryptographic methods.
[...]
Instead of burning only one key into
Nomen Nescio wrote:
It looks like Camenisch Lysyanskaya are patenting their credential
system. This is from the online patent applications database:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/ne
Nomen Nescio wrote:
It looks like Camenisch Lysyanskaya are patenting their credential
system. This is from the online patent applications database:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/ne
It looks like Camenisch Lysyanskaya are patenting their credential
system. This is from the online patent applications database:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.htmlr=1f=Gl=50co1=ANDd=PG01s1=camenischOS=camenischRS=camenisch
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Nomen Nescio wrote:
It looks like Camenisch Lysyanskaya are patenting their credential
system. This is from the online patent applications database:
It looks like Camenisch Lysyanskaya are patenting their credential
system. This is from the online patent applications database:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.htmlr=1f=Gl=50co1=ANDd=PG01s1=camenischOS=camenischRS=camenisch
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Nomen Nescio wrote:
It looks like Camenisch Lysyanskaya are patenting their credential
system. This is from the online patent applications database:
Nomen Nescio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If a key is misused, i.e. scraped out of the TPM and used to create a
virtualized, rule-breaking software TPM, it can be revoked. This means that
all the TPMs that share that one key lose the use of that key. But it doesn't
matter much, because they each
Carl Ellison suggested an alternate way that TCPA could work to allow
for revoking virtualized TPMs without the privacy problems associated
with the present systems, and the technical problems of the elaborate
cryptographic methods.
Consider first the simplest possible method, which is just to
Carl Ellison suggested an alternate way that TCPA could work to allow
for revoking virtualized TPMs without the privacy problems associated
with the present systems, and the technical problems of the elaborate
cryptographic methods.
Consider first the simplest possible method, which is just to
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 04:58:56PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
[...] Also relevant is An Efficient System for Non-transferable
Anonymous Credentials with Optional Anonymity Revocation, Jan
Camenisch and Anna Lysyanskaya, Eurocrypt 01
http://eprint.iacr.org/2001/019/
These credentials
With Brands digital credentials (or Chaums credentials) another
approach is to make the endorsement key pair and certificate the
anonymous credential. That way you can use the endorsement key and
certificate directly rather than having to obtain (blinded) identity
certificates from a privacy CA
Dr. Mike wrote, patiently, persistently and truthfully:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, AARG! Anonymous wrote:
Here are some more thoughts on how cryptography could be used to
enhance user privacy in a system like TCPA. Even if the TCPA group
is not receptive to these proposals, it would be useful
Dr. Mike wrote, patiently, persistently and truthfully:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, AARG! Anonymous wrote:
Here are some more thoughts on how cryptography could be used to
enhance user privacy in a system like TCPA. Even if the TCPA group
is not receptive to these proposals, it would be useful
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, AARG! Anonymous wrote:
Here are some more thoughts on how cryptography could be used to
enhance user privacy in a system like TCPA. Even if the TCPA group
is not receptive to these proposals, it would be useful to have an
understanding of the security issues. And the
15 matches
Mail list logo
