the Americans would be
suicidal... America is not expecting any Asean country to do that.
The Vatican:
Those who decide that all peaceful means that international law
makes available are exhausted assume a grave responsibility before God,
their conscience and history.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi
From: Matthew X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The anarchist culture of autonomy, free association,
self-organization, direct action and personal responsibility.
Longish thread on organization...
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=02/12/03/5135919
Bushfires causing power surges
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anarcho capitalists do not plan to seize and hold power.
Intelligence, organization, and discipline is still required,
but the organization and discipline does not need to be of
the monolithic kind required to seize and hold power.
A perfect
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 10:55 AM, Tim May wrote:
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 10:14 AM, Aimee Farr wrote:
And your insinuation that we are using mattd, for example, as a cat's
paw for violent political action (?) while obtaining plausible
deniabilty is pernicious.
It wasn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Tim wrote:
Personally, I think it would be a _good_ thing if a massively violent
event were to cut the head off the snake. This would speed up the process.
Unfortunately, I don't believe that the current government would be
replaced by the one described in
On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 01:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Tim wrote:
Personally, I think it would be a _good_ thing if a massively violent
event were to cut the head off the snake. This would speed up the
process.
Unfortunately, I don't
--
On 20 Jan 2002, at 13:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Effective revolutionaries need intelligence, organization
and discipline to conduct effective propaganda, plan
sucessful insurrections, and sieze and hold power.
Anarcho capitalists do not plan to seize and hold power.
Intelligence,
When you paint targets on people, other individuals may cause them harm,
seeking some measure of your acceptance.
The rogue Terror state does this everyday,that's one reason why it will
soon be the Last Empire.
Some here might have actual
followers, not fans or confederates-in-cause.
Why
When you paint targets on people, other individuals may cause them harm,
seeking some measure of your acceptance. Some here might have actual
followers, not fans or confederates-in-cause. Some individuals here, and
you even as a group don't have to ask for somebody to be hurt, just imply
that it
Threats of violence here should not be taken seriously, except as
literary outbursts. They are a pressure-relieving belly-bump of the
list, not unlike screaming kill at a sports event or in military
training or as children scream fighting over cop-daddy's Beretta
(and as shown last night on
And your insinuation that we are using mattd, for example, as a cat's
paw for violent political action (?) while obtaining plausible
deniabilty is pernicious.
It wasn't an insinuation, just saying that it happens. I would not like to
see this forum further mischaracterized as being associated
. It is not our collective
responsibility, nor any of our individual responsibilities, to denounce
or repudiate them.
And your insinuation that we are using mattd, for example, as a cat's
paw for violent political action (?) while obtaining plausible
deniabilty is pernicious.
Things must be quiet
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 10:14 AM, Aimee Farr wrote:
And your insinuation that we are using mattd, for example, as a cat's
paw for violent political action (?) while obtaining plausible
deniabilty is pernicious.
It wasn't an insinuation, just saying that it happens. I would not
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Aimee Farr wrote:
When you paint targets on people, other individuals may cause them
harm, seeking some measure of your acceptance. Some here might have
actual followers, not fans or confederates-in-cause. Some
individuals here, and you even as a group don't have to ask
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Aimee Farr wrote:
When you paint targets on people, other individuals may cause them
harm, seeking some measure of your acceptance. Some here might have
Luckily, only individuhhals here. So, keep painting.
actual followers, not fans or confederates-in-cause. Some
somewhere else.
Another thing to consider is that this is not a crowd poised for
immediate physical action against a readily accessible target. I'm
guessing it would be pretty tough to assign legal responsibility for the
actions of one loon to others ( loons or not ) who may have posted here.
I don't
to believe or not believe what they say. It is not our collective
responsibility, nor any of our individual responsibilities, to denounce
or repudiate them.
And your insinuation that we are using mattd, for example, as a cat's
paw for violent political action (?) while obtaining plausible
From Aimee Farr:
I would think SOMEBODY can at least make the effort to say something when
violent sentiments are expressed.
You can. Go ahead.
..
Blanc
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], you write:
A new ABCNEWS translation of the Osama bin Laden videotape released
last week reveals information that may be embarrassing to Saudi
Arabia, a very important U.S. ally. Bin Laden Hunt Strains U.S-Saudi
Relations Excerpts of the Bin Laden Video Weigh In Poll:
A new ABCNEWS translation of the Osama bin Laden videotape released last
week reveals information that may be
embarrassing to Saudi Arabia, a very important U.S. ally. Bin Laden Hunt
Strains U.S-Saudi Relations Excerpts of
the Bin Laden Video Weigh In Poll: Americans Believe Toughest
At 11:05 PM 9/14/01 -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote:
Joe --
I'm not calling in question their right to publish;
Then what is your point?
BTW, if you look at the First Ammendment protections closer, they are
not
guaranteeing absolute right of free speech. Learn the American law
before
you invoke
21 matches
Mail list logo
