Faustine wrote:
[...snip...]
For all its propagandizing, I still think it's entirely possible to come away
from that film convinced that as a nation we need more and better preparation,
not less.
That's the point - you as a nation (the USA) might well have been able
to prepare for it.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, John Young wrote:
Moreover, the tip of downtown Manhattan is within a few
blocks of water on three sides,
And what do you think the effect of a close range nuclear blast will be on
a shallow bay filled with water...can you say drowned rat?
--
tip of downtown Manhattan is within a few blocks of water on three
sides, And what do you think the effect of a close range nuclear blast will
be on a shallow bay filled with water...can you say drowned rat?
Rats can take 5 times the radiation levels of humans and breed faster,dont
write us
Comment on the original thread title: It's bizarre to see politicians
saying We should have been told about the nuke suspected to be in NYC!
The smuggling of a nuke into D.C., the missing suitcase/demolition
nukes, all that stuff, was a hot topic of discussion _here_ and in many
places. (Of
If the nuke is placed at the NY Stock Exchange most New
Yorkers would not be affected by the blast due to the unusually
dense architecture surrounding the exchange -- much denser
than now allowed by zoning and building codes. And many of
the older buildings are substantially built of heavy
Why the Atta bunch wasted their efforts on laborers in WTC rather than
creme-de-la-creme Park and 5th is a mysterious conspiracy.)
They finished the job that started in 93,and they were assisted by details
of the WTC structure that came out in the trial.
No wonder the State seeks secret
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim wrote:
Comment on the original thread title: It's bizarre to see politicians
saying We should have been told about the nuke suspected to be in NYC!
The smuggling of a nuke into D.C., the missing suitcase/demolition
nukes, all that stuff, was a
