If you think this is stupid, just wait till the Real ID Act takes
effect.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95BF
What this country needs is a good old fashioned nuclear enema.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/10/jesus.lawsuit.ap/index.html
Jesus Christ in legal battle
On 2005-05-10T08:53:31-0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
If you think this is stupid, just wait till the Real ID Act takes
effect.
There is already a Jesus Christ living in D.C. If it's legal for
someone named Jesus Christ to move to D.C., it should be legal for a
D.C. resident or no-longer resident
If you think this is stupid, just wait till the Real ID Act takes
effect.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95BF
What this country needs is a good old fashioned nuclear enema.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/10/jesus.lawsuit.ap/index.html
Jesus Christ in legal battle
On 2005-05-10T08:53:31-0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
If you think this is stupid, just wait till the Real ID Act takes
effect.
There is already a Jesus Christ living in D.C. If it's legal for
someone named Jesus Christ to move to D.C., it should be legal for a
D.C. resident or no-longer resident
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 01:23:43 -0400
From: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Politech] More on open letter to PFIR on Whois privacy
[priv]
My own views, for what they're worth, are in a column here:
Note especially the high false-positive-to-hit ratio, and this:
Fatherland Security chief Tom Ridge, for example, has already approved
the use of CAPPS II to identify fugitives wanted for violent crimes.
Computer hunt for terrorists
October 2, 2003
By Charles Piller and Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar,
First answer: He's in red, no green, argggh!
Second answer: We've changed the name of the program to ITAR so his
lawsuit goes back to square 1! That's the plan!
Third answer: CAPPS was just a clever distraction, the real program
remains classified. Please step over here.
Adam
On Tue, Sep
Most people will be coded green and sail through. But up to 8
percent of passengers who board the nation's 26,000 daily flights will
be coded yellow and will undergo additional screening at the
checkpoint, according to people familiar with the program. An estimated
1 to 2 percent will be
What color is John? He's Tie-Dyed, of course...
You were expecting a single category they knew what to do with?
Major Variola (ret.) wrote:
Most people will be coded green and sail through. But up to 8
percent of passengers who board the nation's 26,000 daily flights will
be coded yellow
First answer: He's in red, no green, argggh!
Second answer: We've changed the name of the program to ITAR so his
lawsuit goes back to square 1! That's the plan!
Third answer: CAPPS was just a clever distraction, the real program
remains classified. Please step over here.
Adam
On Tue, Sep
Most people will be coded green and sail through. But up to 8
percent of passengers who board the nation's 26,000 daily flights will
be coded yellow and will undergo additional screening at the
checkpoint, according to people familiar with the program. An estimated
1 to 2 percent will be
What color is John? He's Tie-Dyed, of course...
You were expecting a single category they knew what to do with?
Major Variola (ret.) wrote:
Most people will be coded green and sail through. But up to 8
percent of passengers who board the nation's 26,000 daily flights will
be coded yellow
On Thursday, October 18, 2001, at 05:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1983 I was questioned by a (New York) police officer, who interrupted
my quite open and obvious dictation into a hand held microcassette
recorder to do it. Since he saw the thing in my hand, and did not ask
me
to turn
David Honig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
fishing through wreckage for a crumpled black box recorder seems pretty
old fashioned, too.
30K planes in the air before; maybe 20K now (or 30K 2/3rds full..).
Lots of data from mobile senders. [Yes, some of the 30K are too small to
be interesting.]
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Steve Schear wrote:
Everyone knows it is a bad idea to try and board a plane carrying a box
cutter, a flight manual written in Arabic, or a sack full of mysterious
white powder. But with ultra-tightened airport security, a book could also
prevent you from boarding
It's dodgy.
I wish I could quote chapter and verse, but I don't recall.
The closest you could come and /maybe/ get away with it, would
be to have a cell activated and your lawyer on the line.
LE would still cop a major attitude. They DO NOT like being
documented. They have some laws or
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Tim May wrote:
Personally, I doubt your story. Someone who does what you say was done
to you has clearly earned killing.
While I agree with your assessment that he has earned killing, I do not
see how my failure to kill him earns doubt - one does not necessarily
follow
Everyone knows it is a bad idea to try and board a plane carrying a box
cutter, a flight manual written in Arabic, or a sack full of mysterious
white powder. But with ultra-tightened airport security, a book could also
prevent you from boarding that plane.
No kidding. It happened just last
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:49:28 +0800 F. Marc de Piolenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like we need to be dictating into cellphones, with remote
recording!
fishing through wreckage for a crumpled black box recorder seems pretty
old fashioned, too.
My reward was a crushed microcassette
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
Does anyone know the legal issues surrounding the act of taking
a pocket tape recorder and recording at least my side of this sort
of transaction?
There's actually two questions implied here:
(1) What are the _legal_ implications? The
Don't do it in Massachusetts. They consider it wiretapping. Most states
aren't so funny. But why take it out. Leave it in your pocket (save when
clearing the metal detector, of ocurse).
DCF
At 03:48 PM 10/18/01 -0700, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
Sometime around 02:50 PM 10/18/2001 -0700, Steve
Sounds like we need to be dictating into cellphones, with remote
recording!
Marc de Piolenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the Terry stop escalated, and I was ordered to follow the officer for
more questioning, I asked him, while holding out the recorder for the
answer, whether I was under
Duncan Frissell wrote:
Don't do it in Massachusetts. They consider it wiretapping. Most states
aren't so funny. But why take it out. Leave it in your pocket (save when
clearing the metal detector, of ocurse).
MA wiretapping law applies only to secret recording. In theory, holding
the
About that book:
:Everyone knows it is a bad idea to try and board a plane carrying a box
:cutter, a flight manual written in Arabic, or a sack full of mysterious
:white powder. But with ultra-tightened airport security, a book could also
:prevent you from boarding that plane.
---
I sincerely hope this guy sues these people. Are the Guard troops protected from
lawsuits? People this stupid shouldn't be allowed out
without a keeper, let alone be running around with guns.
Steve Schear wrote:
Everyone knows it is a bad idea to try and board a plane carrying a box
Sometime around 02:50 PM 10/18/2001 -0700, Steve Schear opined thusly:
http://cgi.newcity.com/exitlog/frameset.php?close=http://www.citypaper.net/articles/101801/news.godfrey.shtmlback=http://www.newcity.com
Does anyone know the legal issues surrounding the act of taking
a pocket tape
26 matches
Mail list logo
