µ¿ÀǾøÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» µå·Á¼ Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù.. º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº 1ȸ¿¡ ÇÑÇØ
¹ß¼ÛµË´Ï´Ù.º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ÀÎÅÍ³Ý»ó¿¡ ¿Ã¶ó¿Í ÀÖ´Â ¸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ ¹ßÃéÇÏ¿© ¹ß¼ÛÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù.º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸ Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ë ÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£
µî¿¡ °üÇѹý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é »èÁ¦ÇϽðųª '¼ö½Å °ÅºÎ'¸¦ Ŭ¸¯Çؼ º¸³»
As seen on NBC, CBS, CNN, and Oprah!
Would you like to lose weight while you
sleep?
No dieting!
No hunger pains!
No Cravings!
No strenuous exercise!
Change your life forever!
100% GUARANTEED!
www.quality-hgh.com
*
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:44:10 -0400
From: PA List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Norway Public Announcement
Norway Public Announcement
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesman
June 21, 2002
This Public Announcement is
Speaking personally, if asked DRM privacy, both or neither?
then I will take both -- YMMV.
This bullshit is getting deeper and thicker.
(dis)ability to replay received information at will has next to nothing to do
with ability to stop unwanted parties from obtaining secret information.
Let
At 7:52 PM -0700 on 6/24/02, Somebody wrote:
Uh, come on, Bob. If the original message is sent to a certain list, there
is no reason to forward it without comment to that same certain list.
Damn. Got cryptography confused with cypherpunks.
My mistake. Sorry about that.
Cheers,
RAH
--
TOP Life Companies Continue to Slash Rates
Save up to 70% on your LIFE INSURANCE today!
Term Insurance Comparisons
Permanent (Whole/Universal) Life
Burial/Final Expense
Get
a Quote Here!
Choose the coverage that
Bests suits YOUR needs.
Quotes from over 300 top rated companies
We
Pete Chown writes:
: Anonymous wrote:
:
: Furthermore, inherent to the TCPA concept is that the chip can in
: effect be turned off. No one proposes to forbid you from booting a
: non-compliant OS or including non-compliant drivers.
:
: Good point. At least I hope they don't. :-)
:
:
I don't believe that the choice is both privacy and TCPA, or neither.
Essentially all privacy violations are abuses of authorised access by
insiders. Your employer's medical insurance scheme insists on a
waiver allowing them access to your records, which they then use for
promotion decisions.
Pete Chown wrote:
[...]
This doesn't help with your other point, though; people wouldn't be able
to modify the code and have a useful end product. I wonder if it could
be argued that your private key is part of the source code?
Am I expected to distribute my password with my code?
Peter D. Junger wrote:
: There is not even social opprobrium; look at how eager
: everyone was to look the other way on the question of whether the DeCSS
: reverse engineering violated the click-through agreement.
:
: Perhaps it did, but the licence agreement was unenforceable. It's
:
Gewinne satt schau doch einfach mal vorbei:
www.rubbellose.de.vu
Sandy Harris writes:
: Peter D. Junger wrote:
:
: : There is not even social opprobrium; look at how eager
: : everyone was to look the other way on the question of whether the DeCSS
: : reverse engineering violated the click-through agreement.
: :
: : Perhaps it did, but the licence
URGENT NOTICEPENDING MERGER TO INCREASE REVENUE 236%NOW IS THE TIME TO INVEST IN GWIHGWIH is rapidly expanding through acquisitions. In the 1st Quarter TWO mergers are in proces with a schedule to buy FOUR more profitable companies by the year end.GWIH plans to file for NASDAQ. Stock prices
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a
virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS
This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has
been discarded. For information on removing viruses from
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a
virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS
This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has
been discarded. For information on removing viruses from
It was my understanding that libraries destroy records of patrons'
activity as soon as the books are returned. Nonetheless, this is an
interesting Federal fishing expedition, with warrants issued by secret
courts, and criminal penalties for librarians who talk too much.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I should say, at this point in things, that I've never complained at
all about Brin's heralding some mechanical ubiquity of *observation*,
per se, any more than I complain about the market, celestial
mechanics, or the weather. You can't fight Moore's
Here is the treasury info:
http://www.fms.treas.gov/dts/index.html
DATA: [day# \t value, in millions $$ us]
128 5903323
129 5908064
130 5919484
133 5919899
134 5921164
135 5947373
136 5949975
137 5949975
138 5949975
139 5949975
...
...
175 5949975
176
**
This email message is sent in compliance with the 106th Congress E-Mail
User Protection Act (H.R. 1910) and the Unsolicited Commercial Electronic
Mail Act of 2000 (H.R. 3113). We provide a valid vehicle for
--
-- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a
__
ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002
At 7:52 PM -0700 on 6/24/02, Somebody wrote:
Uh, come on, Bob. If the original message is sent to a certain list, there
is no reason to forward it without comment to that same certain list.
Damn. Got cryptography confused with cypherpunks.
My mistake. Sorry about that.
Cheers,
RAH
--
Pete Chown wrote:
[...]
This doesn't help with your other point, though; people wouldn't be able
to modify the code and have a useful end product. I wonder if it could
be argued that your private key is part of the source code?
Am I expected to distribute my password with my code?
I don't believe that the choice is both privacy and TCPA, or neither.
Essentially all privacy violations are abuses of authorised access by
insiders. Your employer's medical insurance scheme insists on a
waiver allowing them access to your records, which they then use for
promotion decisions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I should say, at this point in things, that I've never complained at
all about Brin's heralding some mechanical ubiquity of *observation*,
per se, any more than I complain about the market, celestial
mechanics, or the weather. You can't fight Moore's
24 matches
Mail list logo
