On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 07:16:47PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
However, I doubt I'll go to jail...now. If Bush gets re-elected, then who
knows.
For all the violations of the Constitution that the Bush administration
has countenanced, it has not been nearly as repressive of political opinions
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected as undeliverable spam. Tried
I'm experimenting with a new sendmail milter.
(the SMTP HELO arg needs to be
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reporting-MTA: dns;tp-ex-04.gamania.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;tp-ieg-03.gamania.com
Arrival-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 03:08:34 +0800
Final-Recipient:
Yes, thanks a lot Eric, lne was a good job.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:08:30AM -0800, Eric Murray wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:48:17AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
On Dec 29, 2003, at 9:42 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub
from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected as undeliverable spam.
Tried
sending it thru a remailer but
Thanks, Eric, for keeping the lne.com node up and running for the last
few years. It's (mostly) a thankless task and you did a great job.
Best,
Declan
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:42:26PM -0800, Eric Murray wrote:
The lne.com CDR node will stop accepting new
subscriptions on Jan 1 2004, and
unsubscribe cypherpunks
Another alternative could be a couple lines of PHP or perl, unsubscribing
via a web form.
On related note, what's a good node to migrate to?
PS: Thanks, Eric. It was a good node.
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 07:58:03PM +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Another alternative could be a couple lines of PHP or perl, unsubscribing
via a web form.
On related note, what's a good node to migrate to?
pro-ns.net is running a CDR similar to lne.
A number of other people have gotten my
On Dec 29, 2003, at 9:42 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub
from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected as undeliverable spam.
Tried
sending it thru a remailer but don't know if majordomo will go for
that.
An unsubscribe
An unsubscribe command sent to the lne.com administrivia address was
rejected as spam?
I find that hard to believe, as that is one of the normal commands,
ones which the lne regular message lists.
It's fairly possible the mail was rejected even before the SMTP
negotiation itself; it did
Bill Stewart wrote:
At 09:37 PM 12/26/2003 -0500, Adam Back wrote:
The 2nd memory [3] bound paper (by Dwork, Goldber and Naor) finds a
flaw in in the first memory-bound function paper (by Adabi, Burrows,
Manasse, and Wobber) which admits a time-space trade-off, proposes an
improved memory-bound
So what's different - another email from a web designer saying that he does
the best work, for the least money, with no risk to you - well, basically,
that this one is true!
Over the past year I have been working with small to medium sized companies
across the UK, providing a 'no-frills' service
At 01:43 PM 12/29/03 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Bill Stewart wrote:
At 09:37 PM 12/26/2003 -0500, Adam Back wrote:
The 2nd memory [3] bound paper (by Dwork, Goldber and Naor) finds a
flaw in in the first memory-bound function paper (by Adabi, Burrows,
Manasse, and Wobber) which admits
..by Congresscritter Cox:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106809,00.html
The terrorists are playing a losing game. But if by making idle
threats that are always taken seriously by people who are just
scared, we can impose enormous costs on the country and the
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected as undeliverable spam. Tried
sending it thru a remailer but don't know if majordomo will go for that.
--
Harmon Seaver
CyberShamanix
http://www.cybershamanix.com
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:48:17AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
On Dec 29, 2003, at 9:42 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub
from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected as undeliverable spam.
Tried
sending it thru a remailer but
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected as undeliverable spam. Tried
I'm experimenting with a new sendmail milter.
(the SMTP HELO arg needs to be
Yes, thanks a lot Eric, lne was a good job.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:08:30AM -0800, Eric Murray wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Hmm, maybe Eric needs to undo his spam filter so people can unsub from
lne.com. I just tried to, but it was rejected
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 07:58:03PM +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Another alternative could be a couple lines of PHP or perl, unsubscribing
via a web form.
On related note, what's a good node to migrate to?
pro-ns.net is running a CDR similar to lne.
A number of other people have gotten my
At 09:37 PM 12/26/2003 -0500, Adam Back wrote:
The 2nd memory [3] bound paper (by Dwork, Goldber and Naor) finds a
flaw in in the first memory-bound function paper (by Adabi, Burrows,
Manasse, and Wobber) which admits a time-space trade-off, proposes an
improved memory-bound function and also in
At 01:43 PM 12/29/03 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Bill Stewart wrote:
At 09:37 PM 12/26/2003 -0500, Adam Back wrote:
The 2nd memory [3] bound paper (by Dwork, Goldber and Naor) finds a
flaw in in the first memory-bound function paper (by Adabi, Burrows,
Manasse, and Wobber) which admits
22 matches
Mail list logo
