mixminion test

-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE- Message-type: plaintext One-line test of mixminion! -END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-

Saving Opportunistic Encryption

We've recently seen FreeS/WAN die, not least due to the apparent practical failure of Opportunistic Encryption. The largest blocking point for deployment of OE always seemed to be the requirement for publishing one's key in the reverse DNS space. While most tech-savvy people are able to get access

Saving Opportunistic Encryption

We've recently seen FreeS/WAN die, not least due to the apparent practical failure of Opportunistic Encryption. The largest blocking point for deployment of OE always seemed to be the requirement for publishing one's key in the reverse DNS space. While most tech-savvy people are able to get access

Re: U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

Harmon Seaver wrote: This isn't a ski mask burglary. We KNOW Saddam ruled Iraq. We KNOW what crimes were committed. Simple syllogism. No we don't. We only know what the propaganda mills have told us. Twenty years ago it was a different story. The propaganda mills were working for

Re: U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

Harmon Seaver wrote: This isn't a ski mask burglary. We KNOW Saddam ruled Iraq. We KNOW what crimes were committed. Simple syllogism. No we don't. We only know what the propaganda mills have told us. Twenty years ago it was a different story. The propaganda mills were working for

Re: Deniable data storage

James A. Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-06: I want fully deniable information storage -- information theoretic deniable, not merely steganographic deniable, for stenography can never be wholly secure. So, StegFS is not deniable enough? I'm not much of a theory buff, but it sure

Re: Deniable data storage

James A. Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-06: I want fully deniable information storage -- information theoretic deniable, not merely steganographic deniable, for stenography can never be wholly secure. So, StegFS is not deniable enough? I'm not much of a theory buff, but it sure

Re: Freenet and DHCP

Hi, Roy M. Silvernail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-03: In looking over the Freenet FAQ (specifically the Firewall/NAT stuff), it looks like a static public IP address is assumed/needed. My DSL connection is DHCP, so my visible IP changes periodically. Even more fun, the visible IP

Re: Freenet and DHCP

Hi, Roy M. Silvernail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-03: In looking over the Freenet FAQ (specifically the Firewall/NAT stuff), it looks like a static public IP address is assumed/needed. My DSL connection is DHCP, so my visible IP changes periodically. Even more fun, the visible IP

phreq?

What frequencies do the lea snoop devices run on? Is there a good site for info on such devices?

stego building

There is a huge concrete building, hardly any windows, occupying the whole block-width between Market and Mission streets in san francisco, one side being 11th street. Funny thing is that it has no markings at all. The main entrance seems to be at 14xx Market, with visible security. Any clues

stego building

There is a huge concrete building, hardly any windows, occupying the whole block-width between Market and Mission streets in san francisco, one side being 11th street. Funny thing is that it has no markings at all. The main entrance seems to be at 14xx Market, with visible security. Any clues