At 6:59 PM -0800 on 12/16/02, Mike Rosing wrote:
70% of the dog's brain is devoted to it's nose
...and the other 30% is devoted to mooching lunch.
:-).
Cheers,
RAH
Seriously. cf recent neuroscience/paleoanthropology research about the
man-dog interface...
--
-
R. A. Hettinga
At 11:00 AM 12/17/02 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
RAH
Seriously. cf recent neuroscience/paleoanthropology research about the
man-dog interface...
He's talking about a recent study (in _Science_) comparing the ability
of domestic
dogs, wolves, and chimps to interpret a human's signals -pointing,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Realtime, cheap, reliable, invisible. Hard to fake, especially if combined
with other biometrics. Can be as sensitive as a canine, in principle.
[...]
http://www.eps.gov/spg/USA/USAMC/DAAD19/DAAD19-03-R-0004/SynopsisP.html
I would think anyone doing
At 11:00 AM 12/17/02 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
RAH
Seriously. cf recent neuroscience/paleoanthropology research about the
man-dog interface...
He's talking about a recent study (in _Science_) comparing the ability
of domestic
dogs, wolves, and chimps to interpret a human's signals -pointing,
Realtime, cheap, reliable, invisible. Hard to fake, especially if combined
with other biometrics. Can be as sensitive as a canine, in principle.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:09:03 -0800
From: Michael Travers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [s-t] olfactory
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Realtime, cheap, reliable, invisible. Hard to fake, especially if combined
with other biometrics. Can be as sensitive as a canine, in principle.
[...]
http://www.eps.gov/spg/USA/USAMC/DAAD19/DAAD19-03-R-0004/SynopsisP.html
I would think anyone doing
