Re: Anonymous blogging and unlicensed medical advice.

2002-12-18 Thread Petro
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:27:42PM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote: > At 08:43 AM 12/11/2002 -0800, Tim May wrote: > >On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 01:31 AM, Morlock Elloi wrote: > > > >>>In a way, Mathew's and Choate's attack upon the list has done > >>>us a favour. The list is now effectively r

Re: Anonymous blogging

2002-12-12 Thread GaryJeffers
My Fellow Cypherpunks,    My defense against getting overwhelmed with Cypherpunks list mail is to use Guan Sin Ong 's excellent archieve: http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks    .    I find this easy and I don't have to delete tons of mail. Yours Truly, Gary Jeffers

CDR: Re: Anonymous blogging,

2002-12-11 Thread Matthew X
>>> a man who hasn't yet thought of *any* American city he wouldn't really rather see nuked until it glowed <<< I thought it was just one with the really large african-american population? >>>-- or any cop car he wouldn't throw rocks at. <<< Well if that's true,he doe's have a good side then. :

Re: Anonymous blogging and unlicensed medical advice.

2002-12-11 Thread Steve Schear
At 04:27 PM 12/11/2002 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote: At 08:43 AM 12/11/2002 -0800, Tim May wrote: On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 01:31 AM, Morlock Elloi wrote: In particular, there's a flu medicine that doesn't leave you feeling good, but takes you from feeling awful to feeling not so hot, w

Re: Anonymous blogging and unlicensed medical advice.

2002-12-11 Thread Bill Stewart
At 08:43 AM 12/11/2002 -0800, Tim May wrote: On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 01:31 AM, Morlock Elloi wrote: In a way, Mathew's and Choate's attack upon the list has done us a favour. The list is now effectively restricted to those with the will and ability to use filters, which raises the

Re: Anonymous blogging

2002-12-11 Thread Tim May
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 01:31 AM, Morlock Elloi wrote: In a way, Mathew's and Choate's attack upon the list has done us a favour. The list is now effectively restricted to those with the will and ability to use filters, which raises the required intelligence level. Does this vindi

Re: Anonymous blogging

2002-12-11 Thread Mike Rosing
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote: > Does this vindicate homeopathy ? I thought the rules were you have to have a smily to signify a joke. But I guess on the net there are no rules :-) Patience, persistence, truth, Dr. mike

Re: Anonymous blogging

2002-12-11 Thread Morlock Elloi
> In a way, Mathew's and Choate's attack upon the list has done > us a favour. The list is now effectively restricted to those > with the will and ability to use filters, which raises the > required intelligence level. Does this vindicate homeopathy ? = end (of original message) Y-a*h*o-o

Anonymous blogging

2002-12-10 Thread Nomen Nescio
ness of my arguments, it's important that there be strong anonymity protection. Does anyone have advice on how to get started with anonymous blogging? I have access to Windows, Linux and Mac systems, and I could go through anonymizer.com or some other service if necessary. Ideally I'd like