Meyer Wolfsheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
S/MIME support is in just about every popular email client out of the box.
Why is PGP more widely used?
[Good reasons snipped]
Those who care about security [0] use PGP, the rest use S/MIME. To steal a
line from Hexed:
S/MIME: For people who could
--
On 23 May 2002 at 10:57, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
3. The people who might use it if it is easy.
This is Joe Sixpack. This is who you are worrying about, wanting
S/MIME to deliver on its promises. This is Templeton is worrying
about, wanting opportunistic mail encryption.
Joe sixpack
The lack of e-mail detailing financial transactions is also the
reason many businesses chose not to incur the overhead of
secure communications.
If there were servers on the internet which automatically
displayed all plaintext e-mail messages which passed through
them as webpages (for the bored,
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Curt Smith wrote:
The lack of e-mail detailing financial transactions is also the
reason many businesses chose not to incur the overhead of
secure communications.
If there were servers on the internet which automatically
displayed all plaintext e-mail messages which
If there were servers on the internet which automatically
displayed all plaintext e-mail messages which passed through
them as webpages (for the bored, curious, and opportunistic),
THEN everyone would see the value of encrypted e-mail.
Most of them do ... they are called MAEs - it's just
Meyer Wolfsheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
S/MIME support is in just about every popular email client out of the box.
Why is PGP more widely used?
[Good reasons snipped]
Those who care about security [0] use PGP, the rest use S/MIME. To steal a
line from Hexed:
S/MIME: For people who could
The lack of e-mail detailing financial transactions is also the
reason many businesses chose not to incur the overhead of
secure communications.
If there were servers on the internet which automatically
displayed all plaintext e-mail messages which passed through
them as webpages (for the bored,
--
On 23 May 2002 at 10:57, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
3. The people who might use it if it is easy.
This is Joe Sixpack. This is who you are worrying about, wanting
S/MIME to deliver on its promises. This is Templeton is worrying
about, wanting opportunistic mail encryption.
Joe sixpack
At 12:21 PM 5/24/02 -0700, Curt Smith wrote:
If there were servers on the internet which automatically
displayed all plaintext e-mail messages which passed through
them as webpages (for the bored, curious, and opportunistic),
THEN everyone would see the value of encrypted e-mail.
Hmm, didn't
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Lucky Green wrote:
Adam wrote:
Which is too bad. If NAI-PGP went away completely, then
compatability problems would be reduced. I also expect that
the German goverment group currently funding GPG would be
more willing to fund UI work for windows.
Tell me about
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Curt Smith wrote:
This is a fairly accurate description of the situation, but
neglects to emphasize that the reason [1-cypherpunk] bothers
convincing [2-coerced associate] to use encrypted e-mail is
because [1] understands its importance and is attempting to
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Curt Smith wrote:
This is a fairly accurate description of the situation, but
neglects to emphasize that the reason [1-cypherpunk] bothers
convincing [2-coerced associate] to use encrypted e-mail is
because [1] understands its importance and is attempting to
12 matches
Mail list logo
