Steve's excellent analysis of how the Network Effect worked against
Mojo indicates a social-fix for Mojo++, ie: make it easy to get on
and get content. Ie, get them hooked. They'll at least be autosharing
stuff they've
downloaded. After they're hooked, folks may feel like contributing
their
At 09:24 AM 11/25/2002 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Steve's excellent analysis of how the Network Effect worked against
Mojo indicates a social-fix for Mojo++, ie: make it easy to get on
and get content. Ie, get them hooked. They'll at least be autosharing
stuff they've
downloaded.
Not
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:59:43 -0800, James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
We should get an anonymous micropayment system working,
interconvertible to real money, or real e-gold, then apply it
to such applications as mixmasters and darknet.
Allegedly yodel is such a system, but yodel
At 04:59 PM 11/21/2002 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
Mojo was intended to do this but it failed, I think it failed
because they failed to monetize mojo before it was introduced
as service management mechanism.
I was part of the team and I respectively disagree. Sorry to sound a bit
like
Mojo was intended to do this but it failed, I think it failed
because they failed to monetize mojo before it was introduced
as service management mechanism.
I think that there is a generic failure of systems that expect some
pre-determined benevolence and cooperation from end users. Contrary to
On Saturday 23 November 2002 11:32 pm, Steve Schear wrote:
At 04:59 PM 11/21/2002 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
Mojo was intended to do this but it failed, I think it failed
because they failed to monetize mojo before it was introduced
as service management mechanism.
I failed because it had
On Saturday 23 November 2002 11:32 pm, Steve Schear wrote:
At 04:59 PM 11/21/2002 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
Mojo was intended to do this but it failed, I think it failed
because they failed to monetize mojo before it was introduced
as service management mechanism.
I failed because it had
At 04:59 PM 11/21/2002 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
Mojo was intended to do this but it failed, I think it failed
because they failed to monetize mojo before it was introduced
as service management mechanism.
I was part of the team and I respectively disagree. Sorry to sound a bit
like
At 04:59 PM 11/21/02 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
--
According to Microsoft,
http://crypto.stanford.edu/DRM2002/darknet5.doc
Darknet is being undermined by free riders.
They attribute this to 2 things: most are on 56Kbps, and legal
harassment of
large sharers is possible.
I suspect it is
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Darknet is being undermined by free riders.
They attribute this to 2 things: most are on 56Kbps, and legal
harassment of large sharers is possible.
I attribute this to lack of agoric load levelling, and prestige
accounting. Legal harassment is
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
Mojo was intended to do this but it failed, I think it failed
because they failed to monetize mojo before it was introduced
as service management mechanism.
Mojo ultimatively failed because MojoNation failed. MNet is very alive,
though, and it will
At 04:59 PM 11/21/02 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
--
According to Microsoft,
http://crypto.stanford.edu/DRM2002/darknet5.doc
Darknet is being undermined by free riders.
They attribute this to 2 things: most are on 56Kbps, and legal
harassment of
large sharers is possible.
I suspect it is
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Darknet is being undermined by free riders.
They attribute this to 2 things: most are on 56Kbps, and legal
harassment of large sharers is possible.
I attribute this to lack of agoric load levelling, and prestige
accounting. Legal harassment is
--
According to Microsoft,
http://crypto.stanford.edu/DRM2002/darknet5.doc
Darknet is being undermined by free riders.
: : Peer-to-peer file sharing assumes that a
: : significant fraction of users adhere to the
: : somewhat post-capitalist idea of sacrificing their
: :
Microsoft faces up to (and renames) BlackNet:
http://crypto.stanford.edu/DRM2002/darknet5.doc
The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution
Peter Biddle, Paul England, Marcus Peinado, and Bryan Willman
Microsoft Corporation[1]
15 matches
Mail list logo