At 09:04 PM 10/2/01 -0400, The Amphibian Anti Defamation League wrote:
(That's a base canard on frogs, by the way. A few years back some
scientist boiled a frog slowly. The frog hopped out of the water as soon
as it got uncomfortably warm.)
Yes but its so useful its worth keeping around
On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 06:04 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
Tim May wrote:
I know that I if I am ever stopped for photographing a dam or a bridge
I hope I'll have the courage to tell the cop to fuck off. If arrested
on such a bogus charge, things will escalate dramatically and I would
Tim May wrote:
On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 06:04 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
Tim May wrote:
I know that I if I am ever stopped for photographing a dam or a bridge
I hope I'll have the courage to tell the cop to fuck off. If arrested
on such a bogus charge, things will escalate
I wrote in January about a Capitol Police (federal) cop telling
me I couldn't take a photo of the Capitol building from
a public sidewalk:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-01636.html
Not an urban legend.
-Declan
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:47:02PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't there cases
Tim May wrote:
Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, and the C. in general. There certain is
no requirement to cooperate.
Where to do otherwise intelligent people pick up these bizarre ideas?
Probably because of all the heretofore unheard of things happening to
people in the courts these
There have been several panicky calls that Arabs were seen at national
tourist spots, including photographing the Hoover Dam. Some on Usenet
are calling for steps to crack down on these photographers.
This is an article I wrote for Usenet:
This is not the Soviet Union. Anyone may photograph