We're jamming, we hope you like jammin' too

At 05:51 AM 6/29/04 +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote: On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote: Yes. But a jammer will draw a Hellfire. A $50 jammer for a $500,000 missile. Sounds like a fair trade to me. ;) During the Yugo colonization, microwave ovens with their doorlocks disabled were

Re: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

At 06:16 AM 5/13/2004 +1000, Ian Farquhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would almost bet money that the commercial interests currently evaluating RFID tags will push for a legislative ban on RFID jamming. And I'll bet they get it too. I really won't matter what they prohibit, it will get out into the

Re: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

At 06:16 AM 5/13/2004 +1000, Ian Farquhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would almost bet money that the commercial interests currently evaluating RFID tags will push for a legislative ban on RFID jamming. And I'll bet they get it too. I really won't matter what they prohibit, it will get out into the

Re: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

RFID jamming should be very easy and a quite amusing DoS attack on commercial targets. Easy because its not frequency hopping, low power, and relatively low frequency. Particularly cute would be transmitting sex-toy codes intermittently. Considering the transmitting powers of the tags, an

We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

At 03:09 PM 5/11/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: The second covers a hacking the system concept. I'd considered something similar myself, though different in approach. Rather than finding RFID chips and redistributing them, why not create programmable RFID broadcasters which could spoof other

Re: CDR: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

On May 12, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Major Variola (ret) wrote: At 03:09 PM 5/11/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: The second covers a hacking the system concept. I'd considered something similar myself, though different in approach. Rather than finding RFID chips and redistributing them, why not create

RE: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

Of Major Variola (ret) Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 1:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too At 03:09 PM 5/11/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: The second covers a hacking the system concept. I'd considered something similar myself

Re: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Major Variola (ret) wrote: | RFID jamming should be very easy and a quite amusing DoS attack | on commercial targets. Easy because its not frequency hopping, low | power, and relatively low frequency. Particularly cute would be | transmitting sex-toy

Re: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

ASK any Elmer you happen to see, what's the best jamming, RFID.. (With apologies to the tuna industry and those too young to know the jingle. Or to know the RF double meanings.) Interesting cultural reference that goes entirely above my head with a cute swooshing sound. Care to explain,

Re: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

RFID jamming should be very easy and a quite amusing DoS attack on commercial targets. Easy because its not frequency hopping, low power, and relatively low frequency. Particularly cute would be transmitting sex-toy codes intermittently. Considering the transmitting powers of the tags, an