Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
NAI is now taking steps to remove the remaining copies of PGP
from the Internet, not long after announcing that the company
will not release its fully completed Mac OS X and Windows XP
versions, and will no longer sell any copies of its PGP software.
Do we still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 11:49 PM -0400 on 5/21/02, Luis Villa wrote, on FoRK:
Well, yes, but you seem to be implying some sinister motive that
not all of us are reading between the lines clearly enough to see
:) I mean, otherwise, this just seems like a fairly garden-variety
At 03:03 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
NAI is now taking steps to remove the remaining copies of PGP from the
Internet, not long after announcing that the company will not release its
fully completed Mac OS X and Windows XP versions, and will no longer sell
any copies of its PGP
At 11:33 PM 5/21/02, you wrote:
At 5:41 PM -0700 on 5/21/02, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote on FoRK:
So what are they trying to do?
I've totally not been following PGP,
so I don't understand what they're doing.
O, I don't kno It looks, to *me* at least, like they're trying
to
Perhaps there is a conflict of interest issue as well?
NAI Labs is comprised of more than 100 dedicated scientific
and academic professionals in four locations in the Unites
States, and is entirely funded by government agencies such as:
the Department of Defense's (DoD) Defense Advanced Research
Disk encryption can always be augmented by physical security,
however communication encryption is dependent on available
encryption tools and legal rights. If quality tools are not
available, then individuals and businesses will not use them.
As long as communication encryption is not
Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
209.157.152.14 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown
Giving up on 209.157.152.14.
--- Original message follows.
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 2002 11:43:03 PDT
Date:
