On Saturday, July 13, 2002, at 09:48 AM, gfgs pedo wrote:
that every 1 should agree on.
would any 1 also like 2 review
For starters, why don't you start writing in standard English?
Even if English is not your first or second language, using such
cutisms as u for you and
any 1 for
2. House panel backs civil service protections in homeland bill
By Molly M. Peterson, National Journal News Service
During a marathon markup session that dragged into the Thursday night and
Friday morning, the House Government Reform Committee voted to ensure civil
service protections for
Albion Zeglin wrote:
Similar to DeCSS, only one Palladium chip needs to be reverse engineered and
it's key(s) broken to virtualize the machine.
If you break one machine's key:
a) You won't need to virtualise it
b) It won't be getting any new software licensed to it
Simulate a Pentium VI
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, John Young wrote:
The US Dept. of Commerce Technology Administration is inviting the
public to make comments for the upcomming Workshop on Digital
Entertainment and Rights Management. The workshop will be held on
July 17.
http://www.ta.doc.gov/comments/comments.htm
hi,
I get the idea,thanx.
Regards Data.
can u pls explain how they have statistical
signatures,pls-
may be using SPN's, i have tried ANSI X9.17 key
generation with GOST-it did have a negligably small
skew-it makes me wonder what statistical signature
they have.The negligable skew is
hi,
Does a fair coin exist in real world?
Like as according to Allan Turing-an event is defined
by set of certain parameters governing the event at
that instant.
by redoing the same experiment-do we always have the
same set of parameters that previously defined the
coin.
it is said that
Random photons in optical systems are easy to get at hight speed, a flame.
BEC's also have the capability to make some significant breaks in the
security of optical encryption. For example, one can trap a photon in a
BEC, measure it's parameters at one of the BEC-component atoms, then
re-emit
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Tim May wrote:
For starters, why don't you start writing in standard English?
Even if English is not your first or second language, using such
cutisms as u for you and
any 1 for anyone is much more misleading than using the standard,
defined words.
Get up on the wrong
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] was seen to declaim:
Albion Zeglin wrote:
Similar to DeCSS, only one Palladium chip needs to be reverse
engineered and it's key(s) broken to virtualize the machine.
If you break one machine's key:
a) You won't need to virtualise it
b) It won't be getting any new
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
The uncertainty principle says that there is a limit on the information
about position and change in position that you can collect. It does not
rule out internal states.
Yes it does, it says that any time you measure a system it WILL be in an
. He was
physically kept from leaving the building, and repeatedly pushed to
reveal his source, until, for whatever
reason, he was allowed to go.
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20020715-115302-3818r
11 matches
Mail list logo
