David E. Weekly[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Naive question here, but what if you made multiple one time pads (XORing
them all together to get your true key) and then sent the different pads
via different mechanisms (one via FedEx, one via secure courier, one via
your best friend)? Unless *all*
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 15:41, Thoenen, Peter Mr. EPS wrote:
(re hunting people)
If anything, this is more wasteful and degrading as you are not
eating the meat...
Speak for yourself.
--
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere Have GNU, Will Travel
Vote Idiotarian --- it's easier than
Steve Schear wrote:
At 06:33 PM 10/15/2002 +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann)
wrote:
Scribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The technology 'sees' the shapes made when radio waves emitted by
mobile
phone masts meet an obstruction. Signals bounced back by immobile
objects,
such as
The Sunnyvale Albertsons has those stupid loyalty cards again, after a
period without.
The card has a prominent Privacy Policy block, whose text is defeated by
the asterisked
italicized phrase, Except when compelled by law.
But amazingly, it has a box, too: I don't wish to fill out this form.
Thoenen, Peter Mr. EPS[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
If you were a *enlightened* vegan, you would see this as no different that
shooting a deer or eating a hamburger. I believe they would argue animals
don't consent to be killed for sport or food either. If anything, this is
more
At 7:52 AM -0700 10/16/02, David Howe wrote:
OTP is the best choice for something that must be secret for all time,
no matter what the expense.
anything that secure for 20,000 years will be sufficient for, go for
PKI instead :)
OTP is also good when:
(1) You can solve the key distribution
Major Variola (ret)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
Rifle and scope: $1,200
Box of .223 Hollowpoint: $6.99
Tarot Deck: $2.95
Scoring an FBI analyst: priceless
Some things are priceless. For everything else, there's MasterCard.
Dedicated to Eunice Squeal Like a Pig Stone
I fail to see
From: Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I fail to see how anyone, anytime, anywhere, can support
the hunting of random non-consenting humans for sport.
Maybe its a PETA activist making a point...
today...
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI) and the
Brookings Institution (BI)
2nd and final meeting of the Continuity of Government Commission to
formulate recommenditions for the countinuty of the three branches
of government in the event
Security is a commons. Like air and water and radio spectrum, any
individual's use of it affects us all. The way to prevent people from
abusing a commons is to regulate it. Companies didn't stop dumping
toxic wastes into rivers because the government asked them
nicely. Companies stopped
at Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:01 PM, Sarad AV
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was seen to say:
Though it has a large key length greater than or equal
to the plain text,why would it be insecure if we can
use a good pseudo random number generators,store the
bits produced on a taper proof medium.
because
At 06:33 PM 10/15/2002 +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) wrote:
Scribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The technology 'sees' the shapes made when radio waves emitted by mobile
phone masts meet an obstruction. Signals bounced back by immobile objects,
such as walls or trees, are filtered out
Naive question here, but what if you made multiple one time pads (XORing
them all together to get your true key) and then sent the different pads
via different mechanisms (one via FedEx, one via secure courier, one via
your best friend)? Unless *all* were compromised, the combined key would
still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The Mixmaster development team is pleased to announce the release of
Mixmaster 2.9b40. This release is expected to become Mixmaster 2.9rc1.
We believe this to be the most stable release of Mixmaster 2.9-beta to
date. Further development on
hi,
An extract frm this months cryptogram goes as below.
On the other hand, if you ever find a product that
actually uses a one-time pad, it is almost certainly
unusable and/or insecure.
So, let me summarize. One-time pads are useless for
Rifle and scope: $1,200
Box of .223 Hollowpoint: $6.99
Tarot Deck: $2.95
Scoring an FBI analyst: priceless
Some things are priceless. For everything else, there's MasterCard.
---
Dedicated to Eunice Squeal Like a Pig Stone
Does this run on linux?
Also, if regular cheapo PC sounboards can digitize 30 MHz (and Nyquist says
this requires 60 MHz sampling rate) then some product managers need ...
flogging.
=
end
(of original message)
Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows:
Faith Hill - Exclusive
David E. Weekly[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
As for PKI being secure for 20,000 years, it sure as hell won't be if
those million-qubit prototypes turn out to be worth their salt.
Think more like 5-10 years. In fact, just about everything except
for OTP solutions will be totally, totally
Does this run on linux?
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:40:33PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
The WR-G303i is the first of our G3
Series of software defined receivers.
A Software Defined Receiver (SDR) is
such where demodulation and
David E. Weekly[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Which means that you should start thinking about
using OTP *now* if you have secrets you'd like to keep past when an
adversary of yours might have access to a quantum computer. ...
OTPs won't help a bit for that problem.
They're fine for
ACTUALLY, quantum computing does more than just halve the effective key
length. With classical computing, the resources required to attack a given
key grow exponentially with key length. (a 128-bit key has 2^128
possibilities, 129 has 2^129, etc. etc. you all know this...)
With quantum
21 matches
Mail list logo
