On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:36:30PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
He's talking about parthogenesis.
There must be several passages which could be interpreted that way. God
put Adam into a deep sleep, and fashoned Eve from his rib. Doable, if you
Morlock Elloi wrote:
Funny, but I can't seem to find the passage in the Bible where it talks about cloning. In fact, I can't find any passage that even remotely impinges on the subject
[...] wasn't there something about exclusivity of conceiving without fucking ?
As a former believer and
John Keley wrote...
There are terrorists who'd want to do nasty things to us for simply
allowing global trade, or for allowing trade with repressive regimes like
Saudi Arabia or Nigeria, or for selling weapons to countries with bad human
rights records.
Hummm...kind of an odd argument, don't
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
He's talking about parthogenesis.
There must be several passages which could be interpreted that way. God
put Adam into a deep sleep, and fashoned Eve from his rib. Doable, if you
knock out one Y chromosome and inject another X from another
Tyler Durden wrote:
John Keley wrote...
Osama Bin Laden might not hate us, but *someone* would.
Well, perhaps we fucked with the wrong guy.
Fucked with. Trained up and fucked over. Whatever.
BTW...a Muslim co-worker sardonically stated recently that our new war
with Iraq is just a way
At 09:44 PM 1/17/03 -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
1) Fucks up the prevailing religion doctrine.
Funny, but I can't seem to find the passage in the Bible where it
talks
about cloning. In fact, I can't find any passage that even remotely
impinges on the subject.
Provided that I had the christian
hi,
Does n't that also mean that the US will have to time
well the ending of the war or the fall of iraq(If iraq
is to fall-that we will have to wait and see).
Usually we have oil reserves which can last three
months from the start of the war.How ever then the US
will not be able to sell
1) Fucks up the prevailing religion doctrine.
Funny, but I can't seem to find the passage in the Bible where it talks
about cloning. In fact, I can't find any passage that even remotely
impinges on the subject.
Provided that I had the christian cult in mind (where I am not an connoisseur),
Don't forget that at that time sanitation practices in cities really sucked.
You threw your full chamber pot and garbage out the window and on to the
street.
Everybody drank from a common well.
Nobody knew about how diseases spread (It was black magic or the wrath of
God for your sins).
Few
Foolish Person. Thinking that the prevailing religious doctrine has
anything to do with the Bible.
PHM
Paul H Merrill, MCSE, CISSP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Kevin S. Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cypherpunks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 19:23
At 8:35 PM -0800 1/17/03, Neil Johnson wrote:
Few people realize that one of the reasons we live so long today is
because of
the lowly toliet.
This is the source of the observation, Governments are like toilets.
They're necessary for public health, but you shouldn't worship them.
YMMV - Bill
Morlock Elloi wrote:
What would be the valid reason for the government to claim power
to regulate her egg, her skin DNA, and her uterus?
1) Fucks up the prevailing religion doctrine.
Funny, but I can't seem to find the passage in the Bible where it talks
about cloning. In fact, I can't
At 06:56 AM 1/16/03 -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Does anyone know a source for a spam list for US military?
It would be great to start spamming them with messages about
how much they are hated by the entire world, how little real
support they have at home
John Kelsey wrote:
No policy toward anyone isn't possible once there's any kind of
contact. There are terrorists who'd want to do nasty things to us for
simply allowing global trade, or for allowing trade with repressive
regimes like Saudi Arabia or Nigeria, or for selling weapons to
At 09:38 AM 1/16/03 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 03:20 PM 1/15/03 -0800, Petro wrote:
...
[Question of whether we could have avoided 9/11 and such things by not
having an activist foreign policy]
Secondly, other groups would have been just as pissed off at us for
*not* helping
15 matches
Mail list logo
