Hi,
Considering that it appears that spammers are now resorting
to DoS'ing sites that host spam lists, wouldn't now be a good
time to investigate the possibilities of a distributed, or at
least, load balanced blacklist provider?
Even something as simple as round-robin DNS with sufficient
nodes
I'm sure certian Virginia boys around here would say that that there's a misspelling
in there, somewhere...
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
From: Paul McFedries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Word Spy for 08/28/2003 -- darknet
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003
On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 09:02 AM, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
I'm sure certian Virginia boys around here would say that that there's
a misspelling in there, somewhere...
Certain Californians will say that the Darknet allegedly coined in
2002 by these guys is clearly a misspelling of Blacknet,
On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 09:46 AM, Steve Schear wrote:
At 10:48 AM 6/26/2002 -0400, Kathleen Dolan wrote:
In many states, it is illegal to store records showing who borrowed a
book from a public library. Maryland, for example, requires
destruction of
the record after a point and even
On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 10:38 AM, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 06:11 PM 8/28/03 -0700, Morlock Elloi wrote:
A 18-24 2.4Ghz grid dish (available for less than $70-90) with 18-21
dB gain
will associate at 11 Mb/s with consumer-grade APs with diversity
antennas at
2-3 miles.
Yes; for naif
At 06:11 PM 8/28/03 -0700, Morlock Elloi wrote:
A 18-24 2.4Ghz grid dish (available for less than $70-90) with 18-21
dB gain
will associate at 11 Mb/s with consumer-grade APs with diversity
antennas at
2-3 miles.
Yes; for naif readers note that the grid means that you don't worry
about wind as
Steve Schear wrote:
Looks like at least one library is trying a variation the method I
suggested...
The Patriot Act also prohibits libraries and others from notifying
patrons and others that an investigation is ongoing. At least one
library has tried a solution to beat the system by regularly
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:21:08PM -0700, Sarad AV wrote:
hi,
Let ~ represents a relation.
If a~b and b~a,then
a~a (by transitivity)
is an incorrect argument.
By definition of transitivity, if a~b and b~c implies
that a~c.
right.
I was asking on the same lines if
At 10:48 AM 6/26/2002 -0400, Kathleen Dolan wrote:
In many states, it is illegal to store records showing who borrowed a
book from a public library. Maryland, for example, requires destruction of
the record after a point and even backups cannot be accessed without a
court order.
KAD
Say a public
hi,
Let ~ represents a relation.
If a~b and b~a,then
a~a (by transitivity)
is an incorrect argument.
By definition of transitivity, if a~b and b~c implies
that a~c.
I was asking on the same lines if (a*d)*d=a*(d*d)=d.
By definition associativity is defined on a,b,c
element of set S and not
10 matches
Mail list logo
