On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
Obvious solution. Require all mandatory uglification of all
foreign scenery -- for example video editing to insert some
smokestacks.
Just pay them to decorate their unfairly lovely landscapes with
king-sized billboards.
*Poof!* Beauty gone,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 06:59:11PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
It's bad enough that that Eugene Leitl has made himself the new Choate,
now you have made yourself the new Detweiler.
The comments from linux-elitists were clueful, and apropos. As I said, I don't
intend
to make it a habit, but my
So, what we need to complete the picture is a good old-fashioned top-posted
CASCADE!!!
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:22:58 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Tim May wrote:
And so why don't you just filter _my_ comments, twit?
I choose to read your comments Tim - as I pointed out, we can all make our
own decisions as to reading material.
It's bad enough that that Eugene Leitl has made himself the new Choate,
now you have
It was discovered a while back, check the archives, or Tim's
FAQ, that all the remailers were compromised, with or without
the operator's complicity with TLAs. After that discovery there
was a turning of the covert control to re-direct it toward its
implementer(s). That was soon re-turned by the
Off All the Pigs!
Death to the Oinks!
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:40:07AM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Nomen pondered:
Why robbing banks? Aside from allowing the
government to regulate them, what have they
done to deserve being robbed
Why not? Revolutionaries need money, and the financial sector
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
does it matter?
Anonymous wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
Eugen Leitl wrote:
The comments from linux-elitists were clueful, and apropos. As
I said, I don't intend
to make it a habit, but my Mailman isn't working yet, and
I don't have time to debug the setup to resurrect cpunx-news.
Here:
https://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
k
At 09:19 AM 12/12/03 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
..
You need to think about the lone warrior scenario that the Gang
worries about. McVeighs and Rudolphs.
They were influenced by memes which were not immediately suppressed.
One interesting property of the lone warriors is that they can't
--
On 12 Dec 2003 at 19:06, Tim May wrote:
Your notion that a gold atom cannot be distinguished from
another has anything important to do with issues at the
crypto and traceability layers is symptomatic of this
delusion.
It has nothing to do with crypto, but a great deal to do with
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 06:49:15PM +0100, Anonymous wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
The community is small enough so that the fraction must be in low 10% at
worst.
What'd be interesting to know how secure the remailer
14 matches
Mail list logo
