Then what are
you doing here? This list is for discussing and implementing cypherpunk
concepts. If you deny them, you should go elsewhere to pursue your goals.
Tsk tsk...this sounds like Orthodoxy to me. Part of the benefit of an
anarchy is to support otherwise-suppressed forms of existence and
Where are you going to buy your hardware from, that it can't be
shut down? How are you going to hide your TX from the DXing
white vans?
Well, you made some interesting points. Actually, it would seem that some of
the Islamic regimes as well as mainland China have been at least partially
Dave Howe (2004-04-13 14:11Z) wrote:
Justin wrote:
It's not just a private interaction between two consenting parties.
It's a contract that grants power to a third party eliminating
traditional legal guarantees of quasi-privacy in communication from
sender to recipient, one of which is
At 05:29 PM 4/13/04 -0400, An Metet wrote:
Major Variola writes:
Crypto *can* keep bits free. And so maybe language.
But Men with Guns control physical reality, which limits what
those bits can do. Read the archives on the problems with
linking credits to dollars or physical merchandise.
Tyler Durden wrote:
Someone enlighten me here...I don't see this as obvious. I might
certainly be willing to pay to route someone else's message if I
understand that to be the real cost of mesh connectivity. In other
words, say I'm driving down the FDR receiving telemetry about the road
Sorry that I pissed on your orthodoxy by doubting that everything was
inevitable in its strongest form.
Aside from inevitability there's the road taken...it may have been
inevitable that the Nazi's would fall (aside from fighting a 2-front war),
but they took out a few folks on their way down.
