On Wed, Apr 14, at 08:22PM, Justin wrote:
| I'm not concerned with the advertising itself. My concern is that the
| Gmail service would provide an unacceptable level of detail on message
| content to whoever's monitoring the advertisement logs.
I only say something because I have
At 01:22 PM 4/14/2004, Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not concerned with the advertising itself. My concern is that the
Gmail service would provide an unacceptable level of detail on message
content to whoever's monitoring the advertisement logs.
Unacceptable to whom, and what should
Note from Matt Gaylor: Ohio Highway Patrol Superintendent, Colonel McClellan says in the below article that the availability of the Matrix database could have brought more law-enforcement attention sooner to the recent Columbus-area car shootings that included the killing Nov. 25 of Gail Knisley
At 07:20 PM 4/10/04 -0400, An Metet wrote:
..
BlackNet thwarts such limitations on the reporting of consumer credit.
Clearly, providing access to this data harms individual privacy.
Yet Cypherpunks traditionally have supported this concept. A privacy
advocacy group promotes technology which would
At 11:05 AM 4/9/04 -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
..
1. The use of receipts which a voter takes from the voting place to 'verify'
that their vote was correctly included in the total opens the way for voter
coercion.
I think the VoteHere scheme and David Chaum's scheme both claim to solve
this problem.
One area we are not addressing in voting security is absentee ballots. The
use of absentee ballots is rising in US elections, and is even being
advocated as a way for individuals to get a printed ballot in jurisdictions
which use electronic-only voting machines. Political parties are
encouraging
John Kelsey wrote:
At 11:05 AM 4/9/04 -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
1. The use of receipts which a voter takes from the voting place to 'verify'
that their vote was correctly included in the total opens the way for voter
coercion.
I think the VoteHere scheme and David Chaum's scheme
For extra credit, try to find even one mainstream newspaper in AmeriKKKa's
Rah Rah free press in which this international wireservice story is
printed.
See the Neocons argue that because the story only appears in the Arab
press, it can't be true. Hey, it worked with Accused Jewish War Criminal
I don't suppose there'll be any civilians in
AmeriKKKa either, and therefore, it will be impossible to label any
destructive act committed against the US, either at home or abroad, as
terrorist.
Ah shit I hate hearing this. Is it possible to retroactively re-cast a
terrorist attack (eg, World
