On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, James A. Donald wrote:
James A. Donald:
McViegh did not target innocents. Bin Laden did target
innocents.
Roy M. Silvernail
I'm confused. Is Mr. Donald saying McVeigh did not surveil
his target sufficiently to know that there was a day care
center in the
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, James A. Donald wrote:
The ICC and the world court have a track record that resembles
the lowest common demoninator of the governments that sponsor
it - They support tyrrany, terror, and slavery, and shattering
confiscation of property.
Agreed.
For all that is wrong
Hey! James! Are you LISTENING?
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95BF
An ill wind is stalking
while evil stars whir
and all the gold apples
go bad to the core
S. Plath, Temper of Time
Latest Editorials
Previous Story Next
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, James A. Donald wrote:
James A. Donald:
Bin Laden's intent was to make anyone in America afraid -
thus the use of airliners, rather than truck bombs.
McViegh's intent was to make BATF afraid.
J.A. Terranson:
This is idiotic. You're claiming that the definition
--
On 23 Oct 2004 at 23:37, Adam wrote:
You know, the more I read posts by Mr. Donald, the more I
believe that he is quite possibly the most apt troll I have
ever encountered.
Why don't you pick one particular factual claim, for example
that Bin Laden was a CIA agent, and defend it,
--
James A. Donald
For all that is wrong with the US government, remember the
condition of people under the great majority of the
world's governments: poverty and fear, where the political
privilege of a few shatters the economy and forces the vast
majority into poverty, for
--
James A. Donald:
Bin Laden's intent was to make anyone in America afraid -
thus the use of airliners, rather than truck bombs.
McViegh's intent was to make BATF afraid.
J.A. Terranson:
This is idiotic. You're claiming that the definition of
terrorist is dependent not on the
--
Adam:
This brings up thoughts of prior debates on whether or not US
citizens are subject to the International Court. We (the US)
are making a habit of forcing our laws on other countries,
but yet we are not subject to the laws of an established
INTERNATIONAL court; one who's laws
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:16:22 -0500 (CDT), J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
I've just never
encountered anyone who had NO doubt about anything the current regime is
doing.
Really? I have - every single person voting for Shrub seems to
--
James A. Donald wrote:
You guys just keep making up facts.
There were no branches of the armed services in the towers.
You are just spouting bullshit, like the story that Osama
Bin Laden was trained by the CIA, that Saddam was installed
in a CIA coup, and all those similar
Can you guys please take it outside? The majority of us just isn't
interested.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:49:52PM -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
Nail your colors to the mast. Pick one of the above and defend
it.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a
Well, the Bush supporters I've met aren't normally so sure. They'll kind
of hem and haw, or saw Well, he's got advisors..., or Well, Kerry ain't
any better. Once in a while they'll point to Buh's believability or
decisiveness, but I've never seen anyone (besides Mr Donald) attempt the
role of
Peter Capelli wrote...
Yet what of your blindness, which doubts *everything* the current
administration does?
1. Abu Ghraib
2. WMD in Iraq
3. Patriot Act
4. Countless ties between this administration and the major contract winners
in Iraq
Hum. Seems a decent amount of doubt is called for.
-TD
--
James A. Donald:
McViegh did not target innocents. Bin Laden did target
innocents.
Roy M. Silvernail
I'm confused. Is Mr. Donald saying McVeigh did not surveil
his target sufficiently to know that there was a day care
center in the damage pattern?
Bin Laden's intent was to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 9:56 PM +0200 10/24/04, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Can you guys please take it outside? The majority of us just isn't
interested.
Oh, please. TantoWho's this us, white man?/Tanto
Personally, I'm having a lot of fun watching this.
What amazes me the most
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:00:46 -0400, Tyler Durden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Capelli wrote...
Yet what of your blindness, which doubts *everything* the current
administration does?
1. Abu Ghraib
2. WMD in Iraq
3. Patriot Act
4. Countless ties between this administration and the
One of the reasons I habitually use the Gibon quote in my .sig.
Cheers,
RAH
---
--- begin forwarded text
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mises Daily Article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mises Daily Article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How Empires Really End
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:45:20 -0400
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:40:12 -0400, Tyler Durden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the Bush supporters I've met aren't normally so sure. They'll kind
of hem and haw, or saw Well, he's got advisors..., or Well, Kerry ain't
any better. Once in a while they'll point to Buh's believability or
- Forwarded message from Russell Turpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Russell Turpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:31:39 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FoRK] Your papers, citizen
This was on Slashdot's political feed. Here's the jaw-dropper:
McCain envisions erecting
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
You MUST be new here, Pete ole boy...
Do you really think Kerry wouldnt have signed the Patriot Act if he
was president? Federalized the drivers license requirements? Pushed
for socialized medicine with central controls? Kerry or Bush, Kang or
You MUST be new here, Pete ole boy...
Do you really think Kerry wouldnt have signed the Patriot Act if he
was president? Federalized the drivers license requirements? Pushed
for socialized medicine with central controls? Kerry or Bush, Kang or
Kodos, in the end it means the same thing.
I'm sure
At 1:57 PM -0500 10/25/04, J.A. Terranson wrote:
Here: Allow me to be the very first - Kerry Very Definitely NEEDS KILLING.
But not until Georgie has had *his* turn.
Exactly the point I was making before. Binary politics are a bitch, boys
and girls.
viz, I'm as cryptoanarchist as the next guy,
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:10:14 -0400, Tyler Durden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You MUST be new here, Pete ole boy...
Not exactly ...
I'm sure there are several Cypherpunks who would be very quick to describe
Kerry as needs killing.
I'm not advocating Tim May style actions, although I do miss
At 2:33 PM -0400 10/25/04, Pete Capelli wrote:
He did keep things active, and was an excellent
counterbalance to RAH.
*Nobody* was a counterbalance to Tim, me or anyone else. Simple fact, no
matter how much he pissed on my shoes, or anyone else's.
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A.
From: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 25, 2004 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Donald's Job Description
Well, the Bush supporters I've met aren't normally so sure. They'll kind
of hem and haw, or saw Well, he's got advisors..., or
At 10:32 PM +0200 10/25/04, Eugen Leitl wrote:
What's he up to these days? It seems he got tired of of USENET, too
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=tcmay%40got.nethl=enlr=c2coff=1safe=offsa=Gscoring=d
Too bad.
Here we go...
At 10:32 PM +0200 10/25/04, Eugen Leitl wrote:
What's he up to these days?
Probably in jail. :-).
I told him not to throw rocks at cop-cars...
Cheers,
RAH
Okay, so he's probably not in *jail*...
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:20:28PM -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
*Nobody* was a counterbalance to Tim, me or anyone else. Simple fact, no
matter how much he pissed on my shoes, or anyone else's.
What's he up to these days? It seems he got tired of of USENET, too
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
Here we go...
http://groups.google.com/groups?num=100hl=enlr=safe=offc2coff=1scoring=dq=%22Tim+May%22btnG=Search
Wow! He's gotten even worse!
US Code 10 does not enslave me to some militia that holds views
generally counter to my
--
J.A. Terranson:
So if I was to go out tomorrow and spread 2000 curies of
Ci into the local subway system As payback for Ruby
Ridge, this would not be an act of terrorism?
James A. Donald:
That would be terrorism, because regardless of what you
*said* your intent was, you would
30 matches
Mail list logo
