Everyone does this openly over here. Anything less than $500k or so
isn't even worth thinking about, since as a kidnap victim, you're sold
for about that much.
I really don't see why it's worthy of an article.
I've been buying cash from other contractors, as well as providing
cash on a
At 6:21 PM -0800 2/14/05, TidBITS Editors wrote:
Don't Trust Your Eyes or URLs
-
by Glenn Fleishman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The clever folks at the Shmoo Group, a bunch of interesting
security folks who punch holes in assumptions about what's
secure on the Internet,
At 6:23 AM -0600 2/15/05, Bruce Schneier wrote:
TSA's Secure Flight
As I wrote last month, I am participating in a working group to study
the security and privacy of Secure Flight, the U.S. government's
program to match airline passengers with a terrorist watch list. In the
end,
--- ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James A. Donald wrote:
The state was created to attack private property rights - to
steal stuff. Some rich people are beneficiaries, but from the
beginning, always at the expense of other rich people.
More commonly states defend the rich against the
Until, of course, people figure out that taggants on everything do nothing
but confuse evidence and custody, not help it.
Go ask the guys in the firearms labs about *that* one.
Cheers,
RAH
---
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,66595,00.html
Wired News
Digital Water Marks Thieves
By
