Re: [silk] Google Targeted ads - gmail (fwd from rishab@dxm.org)

2005-04-01 Thread cypherpunk
On Apr 1, 2005 10:57 AM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now here's your one stop shop for evil. A position for Google minister for > propaganda is about to be posted, so I hear. Let's get this straight. It's not evil if people are voluntarily agreeing to it! Maybe you're being facetious

Re: [silk] Google Targeted ads - gmail (fwd from rishab@dxm.org)

2005-04-01 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:17:46AM -0800, Sarad AV wrote: > hi, > > Maybe it was just a bot parsing the contents of the > mail. Cannot say for sure. Reading every ones g-mail > doesn't appear to be practical. Did you miss the part where Google unofficially admitted storing queries for good? Given

Re: [silk] Google Targeted ads - gmail (fwd from rishab@dxm.org)

2005-04-01 Thread Sarad AV
hi, Maybe it was just a bot parsing the contents of the mail. Cannot say for sure. Reading every ones g-mail doesn't appear to be practical. Sarad. --- Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 09:17 17/03/2005, Biju Chacko wrote: > >Ok, that does it. I am now convinced that Google is > the

Your epapers, please?

2005-04-01 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 10:08 PM 3/31/05 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: > government plan to insert remotely readable chips in American > passports, calling the chips [2]homing devices for high-tech muggers, So the market for faraday-cages for your passport will grow to equilibrium. A cage will cost less than a buck i

new result: "anti-colliding" x.509 certificate

2005-04-01 Thread Weger, B.M.M. de
Hi all, Today I announce the construction of a valid X.509 certificate, based on the MD5 hash function, that allows two different digital signatures on the (identical) "to-be-signed" part. This is based on a new technique of constructing MD5-anti-collisions. For details, see http://www.win.tue.nl