Harmon Seaver wrote:
> > This isn't a ski mask burglary. We KNOW Saddam ruled Iraq.
> > We KNOW what crimes were committed. Simple syllogism.
>
> No we don't. We only know what the propaganda mills have told us.
> Twenty years ago it was a different story.
The propaganda mills were working fo
While I agree with much of what you say I don't think it's likely that any
kind of advanced SIGINT operation was what brought him down. The most important thing
to have is intelligence from humans. From insiders. This is partly the problem with
the intelligence agencies today. They think
Here's one younger person who follows cypherpunks very closely. I do not post because
I have nothing to contribute to the discussion. Someday, when I've learned enough to
be useful, then I will contribute what I can.
Tim's postings re:crypto are the most thought-out, insightful writings you cou
This looks interesting:
---
Stanford Law School Media Release
For Immediate Release: Thursday, October 30, 2003
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL LOCKYER TO ADDRESS
CYBERSECURITY AND VULNERABILITY DISCLOSURE AT
STANFORD LAW SCHOOL
Conference at Stanford Law School, Saturday November 22, 2003, 8
> Has 'haven' for questionable sites sunk?
>
> By Declan McCullagh
> Staff Writer, CNET News.com
> August 4, 2003, 1:38 PM PT
>
> LAS VEGAS--A widely publicized
> project to transform a platform in
> the English Channel into a "safe
> haven" for controversial Web
> businesses has failed due to
> po
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Tim May wrote:
> Did I "invite the public in" when an announcement was made for a
> meeting at my house last September? There were many people I had never
> met personally, nor even heard of.
>
> Nearly all were well-behaved, but what if someone had not been? Were my
> property
